Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was derived for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was derived for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when explaining the origin or source of something, particularly in academic or technical contexts. Example: "The formula was derived for calculating the area of a circle based on its radius."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This happens because the performance bound of SPCPM was derived for the worst-case scenarios.

QSAR equation was derived for cytotoxicity vs molecular descriptors of acridone derivatives.

Each correlation was derived for certain conditions.

Middleton Class A model was derived for single-antenna systems.

The objective was derived for common tern and Eurasian oystercatcher.

A magnetic circuit model was derived for the magnetic actuators.

The mathematical model was derived for theoretical analysis.

The asymptotic analytical formula was derived for interfacial toughness evaluation.

An operational model was derived for the scheme using cellular automata with totalistic rules.

In this study, a minimum 1D velocity model was derived for the Fergana region.

Then a less conservative stability criterion based on LMIs was derived for stochastic neutral systems.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was derived for", ensure that the context clearly indicates what was the basis or source from which something was derived. This helps maintain clarity and precision in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was derived for" without clearly specifying what the subject refers to. Ambiguity can confuse the reader and weaken the statement. Always ensure a clear connection between what was derived and its intended purpose.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was derived for" functions as a passive construction indicating the origin or purpose behind the development of a concept, formula, or method. Ludwig AI's examples show its prevalent use in scientific literature to explain how a specific result was obtained.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

98%

Formal & Business

1%

News & Media

1%

Less common in

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was derived for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression, particularly in scientific and technical contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, it serves to explain the origin or purpose behind the development of a concept or method. Its formal register and common usage in academic and scientific publications make it a reliable choice for precise and objective writing. When using this phrase, it's important to ensure a clear connection between what was derived and its intended purpose to avoid ambiguity and maintain clarity.

FAQs

How is "was derived for" used in a sentence?

The phrase "was derived for" indicates the origin or purpose for which something was developed or obtained. For example, "The equation "was derived for" calculating the area of a circle."

What are some alternatives to "was derived for"?

You can use alternatives like "was obtained for", "was developed for", or "was created for depending on the specific context.

What is the difference between "was derived for" and "was intended for"?

"Was derived for" emphasizes the origin or source, while "was intended for" highlights the intended purpose or goal. For example, a formula can be "derived" from physical laws, but "intended" for a specific application.

Is it better to use "was derived for" or "was created for" in scientific writing?

Both phrases can be suitable, but "was derived for" is often preferred in technical contexts where the origin or logical deduction is important. "Was created for" is more general and suitable when emphasizing the act of bringing something into existence.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: