Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was developed for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was developed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate the purpose or intended use of something that has been created or designed. Example: "The software was developed for improving data analysis efficiency in research projects."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was developed for MS [multiple sclerosis].

News & Media

The Economist

'Silence of the Lambs' was developed for Gene Hackman.

News & Media

The New York Times

Our 23-man roster was developed for everyone to play".

This system was developed for the Ford company in 1911.

CACTI was developed for optical video CS.

It was developed for the startup by Shape in Denmark.

News & Media

TechCrunch

Semi-structured questionnaire was developed for the survey.

This case study was developed for demonstration purposes only.

Here, an AuNP ink was developed for the printing technique.

The numerical model was developed for magnesium alloy M1A.

Finally, the database was developed for areas vulnerable to flood.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was developed for", ensure the context clearly states what was developed and what its intended purpose is. This helps avoid ambiguity and enhances clarity.

Common error

While "was developed for" is grammatically sound, overuse of passive voice can make writing seem less direct. Consider rephrasing to use active voice where appropriate, such as "The team developed this software for data analysis", to create a more engaging sentence.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was developed for" functions as a passive construction indicating the purpose or reason behind the creation or design of something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a grammatically sound way to express intent. The examples show its frequent use in explaining the intended function of various products, systems, and methodologies.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

62%

News & Media

27%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was developed for" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate the purpose or intended use of something. As supported by Ludwig AI, it is particularly prevalent in scientific and news contexts. While versatile, writers should consider using the active voice to enhance directness. Alternatives include "was designed for" and "was created for". When using the phrase, clarity is key: ensure the context clearly defines what was developed and its intended purpose to avoid ambiguity.

FAQs

How can I use "was developed for" in a sentence?

Use "was developed for" to indicate the intended purpose or function of something that has been created or designed. For example, "This app was developed for tracking fitness goals".

What are some alternatives to "was developed for"?

You can use alternatives like "was designed for", "was created for", or "was intended for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was developed for"?

While "was developed for" is in the passive voice and grammatically correct, using the active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct and engaging. For example, instead of "The software was developed for data analysis", you could say "The developers created the software for data analysis".

What's the difference between "was developed for" and "was made for"?

"Was developed for" often implies a more complex or intentional creation process, whereas "was made for" is more general and can refer to simpler purposes or suitability. For example, "This tool was developed for advanced statistical analysis" versus "This toy was made for children".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

79%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: