was credited with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was credited with" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase in written English.
It can be used to attribute a certain achievement or accomplishment to someone. For example: - Jane was credited with spearheading the successful fundraising campaign for the new community center. - The young scientist was credited with discovering a groundbreaking treatment for cancer. - The coach was credited with turning around the team's losing streak and leading them to the championship. - The company was credited with implementing progressive policies that improved employee satisfaction and retention.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It was credited with revitalising Littlehampton.

Independent

He was credited with one tackle.

The New York Times - Sports

He was credited with the victory.

The New York Times

Farson was credited with "original story".

The Guardian

I was credited with bringing rap downtown.

The New Yorker

Luc Robitaille was credited with the goal.

The New York Times - Sports

Justice was credited with a base hit.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Hart was credited with inventing the "eBook" in 1971.

The Washington Post

Cervantes was credited with inventing the modern novel.

Britannica

It was credited with the brand's early success.

The New York Times

In six rounds, Mahan was credited with 35 birdies.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was credited with", ensure the achievement being recognized is clearly stated and the reason for the credit is evident.

Common error

Avoid using "was credited with" when the individual or entity's contribution is indirect or unsubstantiated. Ensure the claim to credit is well-supported and verifiable.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was credited with" functions as a passive construction used to attribute an accomplishment, discovery, or positive contribution to a specific person or entity. It highlights the recognition received for their actions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Encyclopedias

10%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Academia

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was credited with" is a common and grammatically correct way to acknowledge someone's contributions or achievements. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely used to attribute positive actions or discoveries to individuals or entities. Primarily found in news, encyclopedias, and scientific articles, this phrase indicates formal recognition. When writing, ensure that the claim to credit is well-supported, and consider using alternatives like "was attributed to" or "was recognized for" to add nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was given credit for

A more direct and literal way of stating someone received acknowledgement.

was attributed to

Focuses on the source or cause of something, rather than necessarily implying recognition.

was recognized for

Emphasizes public acknowledgement of someone's achievements.

was celebrated for

Suggests a higher degree of public praise and admiration.

was honored for

Implies a formal or official recognition of merit.

was lauded for

Suggests enthusiastic praise or commendation.

was known for

Highlights a general reputation based on specific actions or qualities.

was responsible for

Indicates accountability for an outcome, but doesn't necessarily imply praise.

is considered responsible for

More formal and emphasizes causality and accountability.

is regarded as the originator of

This stresses innovation but still implies the person did something noteworthy.

FAQs

How can I use "was credited with" in a sentence?

Use "was credited with" to attribute a specific achievement or action to someone. For example, "The scientist "was credited with" discovering the new vaccine".

What are some alternatives to "was credited with"?

You can use alternatives like "was attributed to", "was recognized for", or "was given credit for" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to use "was credited with" in passive voice?

Yes, "was credited with" is already in the passive voice, making it suitable for emphasizing the achievement rather than the person giving the credit.

What is the difference between "was credited with" and "was responsible for"?

"Was credited with" implies recognition and praise for a positive outcome, while "was responsible for" simply indicates accountability, regardless of whether the outcome was positive or negative.