was recognized for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was recognized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone received acknowledgment or praise for a specific achievement or contribution. Example: "She was recognized for her outstanding contributions to the community."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

He was recognized for 35 years of service by NYU.

The New York Times

Dr. Walker was recognized for obtaining financial support for dance.

The New York Times

The book was recognized for melding scholarship and engaging prose.

The New York Times

Williams was recognized for his brilliance even as an undergraduate.

Encyclopedia Britannica

On the bus to prison, he was recognized for being one thing: a notorious child molester.

The New York Times - Sports

Mr. Dietrich was recognized for the quality and breadth of his collecting interests.

The New York Times - Arts

"He was recognized for forming a successful partnership with John Niblack".

The New York Times

Shirley was recognized for her significant community accomplish ments by the Governor in 2001.

The New York Times

But by the 1880s Kirkness was recognized for his skill at making traditional chairs.

The New York Times - Arts

He was recognized for his work in economic geography and in identifying international trade patterns.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was recognized for his work in game theory on the theory of stable allocations.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was recognized for", ensure that the reason for recognition is clearly and specifically stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid stating the reason for recognition in broad terms. Instead of "He was recognized for his contributions", specify "He was recognized for his contributions to cancer research".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was recognized for" functions as a passive construction used to highlight the reason for acknowledgment or commendation of a person, achievement, or attribute. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage, providing numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Encyclopedias

22%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was recognized for" is a versatile and frequently used construction to denote formal acknowledgment or praise for a specific attribute or achievement. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically correct and widely applicable in various contexts, particularly in news, encyclopedias and scientific publications. When using this phrase, ensure to clearly specify the reason for recognition to provide clarity and impact. It's crucial to avoid vague statements and opt for specific details to enhance understanding and appreciation. In essence, "was recognized for" is a powerful tool for highlighting noteworthy accomplishments and contributions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was acknowledged for

Focuses more on the act of acknowledging someone's contributions or qualities.

was honored for

Implies a formal bestowal of honor or award.

was commended for

Highlights the positive feedback or praise received.

was praised for

Emphasizes the positive expression of approval.

received accolades for

Suggests a high level of praise and recognition.

was celebrated for

Implies a joyful public acknowledgement.

was distinguished for

Highlights exceptional qualities or achievements.

was credited with

Focuses on giving someone the due credit for an achievement.

earned recognition for

Highlights the effort made to achieve acknowledgment.

gained notoriety for

May indicate fame due to good or bad reasons.

FAQs

How to use "was recognized for" in a sentence?

Use "was recognized for" to indicate that someone or something received acknowledgment or praise for a specific achievement or quality. For example: "She "was recognized for" her outstanding contributions to the community".

What can I say instead of "was recognized for"?

You can use alternatives like "was acknowledged for", "was honored for", or "was commended for" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was recognized for"?

While both active and passive voices are grammatically correct, the passive voice with "was recognized for" is often used to emphasize the recipient of the recognition rather than the giver. The active voice would be: "The organization recognized her for..."

What's the difference between "was recognized for" and "became known for"?

"Was recognized for" implies a formal acknowledgment or praise, while "became known for" suggests a gradual increase in public awareness or reputation, without necessarily implying formal commendation.