was credited

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was credited" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that someone received recognition or acknowledgment for something they did or contributed to. Example: "She was credited with the success of the project due to her innovative ideas and leadership."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was credited with one tackle and two passes defended.

The New York Times - Sports

No director was credited.

The Guardian - Music

Haggis was credited as a co-creator.

The New Yorker

It was credited with revitalising Littlehampton.

Independent

He was credited with one tackle.

The New York Times - Sports

The assist was credited to Patrolman Bronleven.

The New York Times

Mr. Regen was credited as associate producer.

The New York Times - Arts

He was credited with the victory.

The New York Times

Farson was credited with "original story".

The Guardian

I was credited with bringing rap downtown.

The New Yorker

He was credited as executive producer.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was credited" when you want to highlight the person or entity receiving acknowledgment for a particular accomplishment or contribution. Be specific about what they were credited with to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was credited" without proper verification. Always ensure the individual or source being credited genuinely deserves the recognition; otherwise, it can lead to inaccuracies and ethical issues.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was credited" functions as a passive verb phrase indicating that a subject received recognition or acknowledgment. Ludwig's examples show its usage in attributing achievements, inventions, or contributions to specific individuals or entities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Wiki

23%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Sports

10%

Science & Research

5%

Huffington Post

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was credited" is a commonly used and grammatically correct passive verb phrase that serves to acknowledge and attribute recognition for achievements or contributions. As Ludwig AI confirms, it appears frequently in news and media, Wiki, and encyclopedic sources, reflecting its versatility across various contexts. When using "was credited", be sure to clearly specify the action or achievement for which the credit is given and verify the accuracy of the attribution.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

received credit

Emphasizes the act of getting recognized or acknowledged.

was attributed to

Highlights the cause-and-effect relationship between someone and an achievement.

was recognized for

Focuses on public acknowledgement and praise.

was acknowledged as

Implies formal recognition, often in an official capacity.

earned recognition for

Stresses the effort and merit behind gaining acknowledgment.

is considered responsible for

Highlights accountability and involvement in the outcome.

is given the honour of

Elevates the recognition to a form of respect or privilege.

was lauded for

Emphasizes praise and admiration received for something.

is known for

Focuses on a person's reputation or established expertise.

has been praised for

Stresses positive feedback and admiration for a specific accomplishment

FAQs

How is "was credited" used in a sentence?

The phrase "was credited" is used to indicate that someone received recognition or acknowledgment for something. For example: "She "was credited" with the discovery."

What are some alternatives to "was credited"?

You can use alternatives like "was attributed to", "was recognized for", or "received credit", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "was credited for" or "was credited with"?

Both are correct, but "was credited with" is more common when referring to a specific achievement or contribution. "Was credited for" is often used when the reason for the credit is less specific.

What's the difference between "was credited" and "was blamed"?

"Was credited" implies receiving positive recognition, while "was blamed" implies being assigned responsibility for something negative. They are antonyms in this context.