was substantiated

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was substantiated" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to evidence or claims that have been supported or confirmed. Example: "The allegations against the company were thoroughly investigated and were substantiated by multiple sources."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

One complaint was substantiated.

The New York Times

The case was substantiated and closed.

The Guardian

Of those complaints, one was substantiated, he said.

The New York Times

Only one of the claims last year was substantiated.

The New York Times

The story was substantiated by just two testimonials.

The Guardian - Books

Thus, the Qing claim for suzerainty was substantiated.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"Neglect/lack of medical care was substantiated regarding the actions of foster parent".

The New York Times

Even ancient philosophers had guessed this law, and it was substantiated in the 17th century.

Encyclopedia Britannica

That report was substantiated, on Twitter, by one of the local policing teams attached to Murdoch police station, in Perth's southern suburbs.

The Guardian

"Mr Kederis has consistently maintained his innocence and this was substantiated by further evidence we were able to submit to the tribunal following its deliberations in January.

The Guardian - Sport

The discharge recombination reaction route was substantiated.

Electrochimica Acta

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was substantiated" when you want to emphasize that a claim or statement has been supported by solid evidence, making it credible and reliable.

Common error

Avoid overuse of the passive voice when using "was substantiated". Ensure the sentence clearly indicates who or what provided the substantiating evidence for a more direct and engaging writing style.

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "was substantiated" is to assert that a particular claim, report, or finding has been supported by evidence or proof. It functions as a passive construction indicating that something received confirmation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

31%

News & Media

28%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Wiki

4%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was substantiated" is a common and grammatically correct way to indicate that a claim or statement has been supported by evidence. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely used in formal writing, particularly in science and news media where accuracy is key. When using "was substantiated", ensure clarity by specifying what or who provided the supporting evidence. Consider alternatives like "was confirmed" or "was verified" for different nuances, and avoid overusing the passive voice to maintain a direct and engaging writing style. Remember, the goal is to communicate credibility and trustworthiness by clearly demonstrating the basis for your assertions.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was confirmed

This alternative offers a more direct and simpler way to express verification, without the implication of needing substantial proof.

was verified

Similar to "was confirmed", but often implies a formal or systematic check for accuracy.

was corroborated

Indicates that evidence from multiple sources supports the original claim.

was validated

Implies that something has been officially recognized as legitimate or true after testing or evaluation.

was proven

Suggests that something has been definitively shown to be true, often through rigorous testing or evidence.

was supported

Indicates that evidence provides backing for a claim, without necessarily proving it definitively.

was authenticated

Implies that the genuineness or validity of something has been established.

was borne out

Means that events or further evidence have confirmed the truth of something.

was demonstrated

Suggests that something has been clearly shown or proven through action or example.

found support

This alternative shifts the focus to the claim itself, emphasizing that the claim gained backing from available data or sources.

FAQs

How can I use "was substantiated" in a sentence?

The phrase "was substantiated" is used to indicate that a claim or statement has been supported with evidence. For example, "The allegations against the company /s/were+substantiated were substantiated by multiple sources".

What are some alternatives to "was substantiated"?

Alternatives include "was confirmed", "was verified", or "was corroborated", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was substantiated"?

While "was substantiated" is in the passive voice, it's grammatically correct. However, using the active voice can sometimes make your writing more direct. For example, instead of "The claim /s/was+substantiated was substantiated by the data", you could say "The data substantiated the claim".

What's the difference between "was substantiated" and "was verified"?

"Was substantiated" implies that evidence supports a claim, while "was verified" suggests a formal check to ensure accuracy. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the supporting evidence or the confirmation process.