Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was checked for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was checked for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was examined or tested for a specific purpose or condition. Example: "The document was checked for any errors before submission."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Energy equilibration was checked for these steps.

Science & Research

Nature

Bias Correction and Background Correction was checked for protein quantification and normalization.

Science & Research

Nature

The model response was checked for the FD grid refinement, while attempting to minimize run time.

The proposed algorithm was checked for its performance in local environmental condition.

The computational basis was checked for errors when used for solving a quantum algorithm.

The designed probe was checked for its specificity by computer-aided comparative sequence analysis.

His home was checked for radiation but no trace was found and he recovered.

News & Media

The Times

The following night (29 Dec. 80) the area was checked for radiation.

News & Media

The New York Times

Their clothing was checked for anthrax when they left the work area.

News & Media

The New York Times

After the milk was checked for antioxidant activity, the researchers refrigerated some and froze the rest.

His property was checked for traces of radiation but his death was attributed to natural causes.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was checked for", ensure the object being checked and the purpose of the check are clearly stated to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was checked for" without specifying what was being looked for. For instance, instead of saying "The system was checked for issues", specify "The system was checked for security vulnerabilities".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was checked for" functions as a passive construction, indicating that a subject received an action of checking or examination, as confirmed by Ludwig. It highlights that something was examined to identify specific attributes or conditions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

News & Media

22%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was checked for" is a versatile and frequently used passive construction, as affirmed by Ludwig AI. Predominantly found in scientific and news media contexts, it conveys that a process of examination or verification has been conducted. Its function is to inform the audience about due diligence or quality control measures. While adaptable across various formality levels, it is particularly prevalent in neutral to formal settings. When using the phrase, ensure the object being checked and the purpose of the check are stated to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "was inspected for" or "was examined for" can be used depending on the context.

FAQs

How to use "was checked for" in a sentence?

Use "was checked for" to indicate that something underwent examination to identify a specific condition or attribute. For example, "The water "was checked for" contaminants".

What can I say instead of "was checked for"?

You can use alternatives like "was inspected for", "was examined for", or "was screened for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "was checked for" or "is checked for"?

"Was checked for" is used for past events, while "is checked for" is for present or habitual actions. For example, "The equipment "was checked for" damage yesterday", versus "The equipment "is checked for" wear and tear weekly".

What's the difference between "was checked for" and "was tested for"?

"Was checked for" implies a broader examination, while "was tested for" suggests a formal assessment of performance or functionality. For instance, "The code "was checked for" errors", but "The software was tested for compatibility".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: