was checked by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was checked by" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It is usually used to indicate that something or someone was examined or verified by someone else. You can use this phrase in any context where someone or something is being confirmed or evaluated by another party. Example: The report was checked by the editor for any errors before being published.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Library integrity was checked by gel electrophoresis.

Nature

That conspiracy (late 1254) was checked by Pope Alexander IV.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Convergence was checked by inspecting posterior distributions of the parameters.

Nature

The convergence of this method was checked by error calculation.

Fusion Engineering and Design

The purity was checked by electrophoresis and UV Vis spectroscopy.

Bioresource Technology

The quality of isolated DNA was checked by PCR amplification.

Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

The adequacy of the models was checked by ANOVA technique.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Psychometric quality was checked by using Item Response Theory.

Applied Ergonomics

This composition profile was checked by 13C n.m.r.

Polymer

The phase build-up was checked by XRD methods.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Stability was checked by recycling the solid catalysts several times.

Catalysis Today

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was checked by" to clearly indicate who or what performed the verification. This ensures accountability and provides context for the checking process.

Common error

Avoid using "was checked" without specifying who performed the check. The passive voice can obscure responsibility and make the statement less informative.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was checked by" functions as a passive construction indicating that a subject underwent a process of verification or examination. It signifies that an action (checking) was performed on the subject by a specified agent. Ludwig's AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

95%

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

News & Media

1%

Academia

1%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was checked by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction that communicates verification or examination. According to Ludwig, it's a perfectly acceptable phrase. Predominantly used in scientific and formal contexts, this phrase indicates that a subject has undergone a validation process performed by a specified agent. While grammatically correct, using active voice might sometimes offer more directness. Remember to specify the checker to avoid vagueness. Consider alternatives like "was verified by" or "was examined by" based on context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was verified by

Emphasizes the confirmation of truth or accuracy through investigation.

was validated by

Stresses the establishment of legitimacy or correctness.

was examined by

Highlights a thorough inspection or analysis.

was inspected by

Focuses on a visual or detailed review for flaws or conformity.

was scrutinized by

Highlights careful and critical examination.

was reviewed by

Indicates a formal assessment or critique.

was assessed by

Suggests an evaluation of quality or value.

was audited by

Implies a systematic examination of records or accounts.

was monitored by

Focuses on continuous observation and oversight.

was controlled by

Indicates regulation or influence over something.

FAQs

How can I use "was checked by" in a sentence?

Use "was checked by" to indicate that something underwent verification or examination. For example, "The data "was checked by" the research team for accuracy".

What are some alternatives to "was checked by"?

You can use alternatives like "was verified by", "was examined by", or "was inspected by" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with checking processes?

While "was checked by" is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "The editor checked the report") can often make the sentence more direct and easier to understand.

What does "was checked by" imply about the checking process?

The phrase implies that a verification or examination process occurred, performed by the entity specified after "by". It suggests a step taken to ensure accuracy, quality, or compliance.