was characterised in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was characterised in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing how something is defined or identified in a particular context or work. Example: "The study was characterised in the report as a significant advancement in renewable energy technology."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

The manufactured hardfacing alloy was characterised in terms of microstructure, mechanical properties and abrasive wear resistance.

Surface and Coatings Technology

But this was a heartfelt slap on the back from a man who was characterised in some quarters as a curmudgeon for his comments after the second Test.

The Guardian - Sport

The optimal formulation was characterised in terms of mucoadhesivity, release kinetics, swelling/erosion, hydration dynamics and surface pH.

International Journal of Pharmaceutics

The flow pattern of each tank was characterised in a previous paper by using particle tracking velocimetry (PTV) techniques.

Aquacultural Engineering

The pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of nicotine delivered by an Electronic Vapour Product (EVP) was characterised in a 2-part study in smokers.

Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

The nanocomposite was characterised in terms of particle size analysis, solubility, percentage entrapment efficiency, drug-loading capacity, surface morphology, drug content, in vitro dissolution, stability and bioavailability.

European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

The microstructure of the volume was characterised in terms of porosity and then meshed with tetrahedral elements for finite element analysis.

Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies

The HS-SPME-GC-MS method for each fibre was characterised in terms of linearity, detection (LOD) and quantification (LOQ) limits and repeatability.

Journal of Chromatography A

In the present study, the assimilation and depuration of dietary MeHg and the influence of dietary selenium on MeHg toxicokinetics was characterised in zebrafish (Danio rerio).

Aquatic Toxicology

Cynara oil profile was characterised in terms of major fatty acids as: 10.7% palmitic, 3.7% stearic, 25.0% oleic and 59.7% linoleic.

Biomass and Bioenergy

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Furthermore the expression profile of these genes was characterised in-vitro in both monolayer and three dimensional (3D) cultures of tendon fibroblasts to identify whether such models fully recapitulate the tendon phenotype.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was characterised in", ensure the context is clear by specifying the source or criteria used for the characterization. For example, "The study was characterised in the report as preliminary."

Common error

Avoid using "was characterised in" without providing sufficient detail about the characterization. Saying "it was characterised in the literature" is less effective than specifying "it was characterised in Smith's 2020 study as highly volatile".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was characterised in" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that something has been defined or described with specific attributes within a certain context. As Ludwig AI confirms, the structure is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

72%

News & Media

21%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was characterised in" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to denote how something has been defined or described within a specific context, as evidenced by the numerous examples spanning across scientific literature, news articles, and general references. While generally neutral to formal in register, the most common usage contexts are Science and News & Media. Alternatives like "was defined within" or "was described by" can be used to add nuance to the writing. It is crucial to provide sufficient detail about the characterization to avoid vagueness and enhance clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was defined within

Emphasizes a formal or explicit definition within a specific scope.

was described by

Highlights the description provided by a particular source or entity.

was portrayed through

Focuses on the manner in which something is depicted or represented.

was outlined within

Stresses a structured or schematic presentation within a defined boundary.

was identified as

Indicates the recognition or classification of something with certain attributes in a defined context.

was labeled within

Highlights the term used to categorize in the frame of a discussion.

was considered under

Suggests a viewpoint or factor taken into account.

was presented in

Emphasizes the way the content has been exposed in a given medium.

was understood through

Focuses on the interpretation or comprehension of something through a particular lens.

was framed by

Focuses on the conceptual context or perspective used to present or interpret something.

FAQs

How can I use "was characterised in" in a sentence?

Use "was characterised in" to describe how something is defined or portrayed within a specific context. For example, "The economic downturn "was characterised in" the news reports as a period of high unemployment".

What are some alternatives to "was characterised in"?

You can use alternatives such as "was defined within", "was described by", or "was identified as" depending on the specific meaning you want to convey.

Is it better to use "was characterised in" or "was described in"?

The choice between "was characterised in" and "was described in" depends on the nuance you want to convey. "Was characterised in" implies a specific set of features or qualities were attributed, while "was described in" is a more general term for providing information about something.

Can "was characterised in" be used in both formal and informal writing?

Yes, "was characterised in" is suitable for both formal and informal writing, though it's more commonly found in formal contexts such as academic papers, news articles, and business reports. In informal writing, simpler phrases like "was seen as" or "was known as" might be preferred.