Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was described by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "was described by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to how someone or something has been characterized or explained by another person or source. Example: "The phenomenon was described by several researchers in their studies on climate change."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
His mood was described by prison guards as "relaxed".
News & Media
Houser, 59, was described by police as a "drifter".
News & Media
Mr. Goss's role was described by former intelligence officials.
News & Media
She was described by colleagues as "terribly committed".
News & Media
A draft outline was described by board members this week.
News & Media
The report was described by JR Scott as "an experiment".
News & Media
The explosive device was described by the police as "viable".
News & Media
The tactic they perfected was described by critics as "victimhood".
News & Media
Sexual intercourse was described by six patients.
The procedure was described by Hwang (Hwang2001).
Protocol was described by T. Mosmann [33].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was described by" to attribute a specific characterization or explanation to a source, ensuring clarity and credibility in your writing.
Common error
Avoid using "was described by" without properly identifying the source. Ensure the description accurately reflects the source's viewpoint.
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was described by" functions as a passive construction used to attribute a description or characterization to a specific source or individual. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, supported by numerous examples.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Science
50%
Wiki
20%
Less common in
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "was described by" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction for attributing descriptions to specific sources. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and highlights its prevalence in news, scientific literature, and general reference materials. When using this phrase, ensure accurate attribution to maintain credibility. Alternatives like "was characterized by", "was defined by", and "was portrayed by" can add nuance depending on the intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was characterized by
Focuses on the qualities or features used to define something.
was defined by
Emphasizes a formal or precise explanation of something.
was portrayed by
Highlights the way something was represented or depicted.
was labeled by
Indicates the assignment of a specific term or category.
was depicted by
Similar to 'portrayed', focusing on visual or artistic representation.
was explained by
Highlights the provision of reasons or understanding about something.
was termed by
Emphasizes the specific word or phrase used to refer to something.
was outlined by
Focuses on providing a summary or main points.
was designated by
Indicates the assignment of a specific role or function.
was considered by
Highlights an opinion or point of view about something.
FAQs
How can I use "was described by" in a sentence?
Use "was described by" to show how someone or something is characterized by a source. For example, "The phenomenon "was described by" researchers as complex".
What are some alternatives to "was described by"?
You can use alternatives such as "was characterized by", "was defined by", or "was portrayed by" depending on the nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "was described from" instead of "was described by"?
No, the correct preposition to use with "was described" when attributing the description to a source is "by". Using "from" would be grammatically incorrect in this context.
What's the difference between "was described by" and "was explained by"?
"Was described by" indicates a characterization or portrayal, while "was explained by" suggests a reason or understanding was provided. Choose the phrase that best fits the context.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested