was attributed with

USAGE SUMMARY

"was attributed with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you wish to attribute a feeling, action, or quality to someone. For example: "The mayor was attributed with a newfound courage to face her political opponents."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

[email protected] The following correction was printed in the Guardian's Corrections and Clarifications column, Tuesday June 25 , 2002There was a lordly mix-up in Smallweed when Lord Faulkner was attributed with some comments regarding lawyers that had, in fact, come from the homonymic Lord Falconer of Thoroton QC, minister for criminal justice.

The Guardian

To select mountainous watersheds, each watershed was attributed with a maximum elevation.

Ecological Processes

Thus, according to the Realise2© results and debrief, she was attributed with strengths such as Adherence, Catalyst and Feedback.

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Tresham's complicity was not revealed until the following day, although he was attributed with only a minor role.

Wikipedia

In other examples, a failure to give proper gas masks to workers spraying pesticides was attributed with causing serious health problems including respiratory problems, persistent coughing, blood clotting in the nose, headaches, and bouts of weakness.

Vice

One species was attributed with an even lower clutch size in North America, the great grey owl with a mean of 2.6, but the mean clutch size was much higher for the same species in Europe, at 4.05.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

Eleven other works are attributed with some certainty to Tulsidas.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The contents of the Sutta Pitaka are attributed, with few exceptions, to the Gautama Buddha himself.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The Met owns just a handful of works that can be attributed, with confidence, to Diego Rodríguez de Silva y Velázquez (1599-1660).

The New York Times - Arts

Although some whales have been attributed with a human-like intelligence, there is little scientific evidence to support such claims.

The Guardian

Einstein never "pioneered" quantum mechanics; other physicists such as Bohr and Heisenberg can be attributed with this theoretical work.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was attributed with", ensure that the subject to whom something is being attributed is clearly defined. This avoids ambiguity and strengthens the clarity of your writing.

Common error

Avoid mismatching the verb tense. Using "is attributed with" when the context implies a past event can cause confusion. Ensure your verb tense aligns with the timeline of your statement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was attributed with" functions as a passive verb construction used to indicate that a particular quality, action, or creation is believed to belong to someone or something. As noted by Ludwig AI, the phrase is usable in written English and serves to assign a characteristic or action.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

35%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was attributed with" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that a particular quality, action, or creation is believed to belong to someone or something. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is suitable for a variety of contexts, including science, news media, and encyclopedic content. When using this phrase, be mindful of maintaining subject-verb agreement and accurately reflecting the past or present association. Alternatives such as "was credited with" or "was associated with" can provide nuanced variations in meaning. This comprehensive analysis helps ensure effective and precise use of "was attributed with" in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was credited with

Emphasizes recognition for an achievement or quality; focuses on positive acknowledgment rather than a general association.

was assigned to

Highlights the act of formally allocating or designating something, implying a specific duty or function.

was associated with

Indicates a connection or relationship, but does not necessarily imply direct causation or origin.

was linked to

Suggests a connection, often causal or correlational, between two or more things, potentially implying a dependency.

was identified as

Implies a process of discovery or recognition, where something is categorized or labeled based on certain characteristics.

was regarded as

Focuses on perception and opinion, suggesting that something is viewed in a particular way by others.

was believed to have

Indicates a held conviction or assumption, potentially lacking definitive proof or evidence.

was considered to possess

Highlights an assessment or evaluation of a particular quality or characteristic.

was thought to have

Similar to "was believed to have", but with a slightly weaker emphasis on conviction.

was rumored to be

Indicates the presence of an unverified story or piece of information that is widely circulated.

FAQs

How do I use "was attributed with" in a sentence?

Use "was attributed with" to indicate that a particular quality, action, or creation is believed to belong to someone. For example, "The discovery "was attributed with" the young scientist".

What are some alternatives to "was attributed with"?

Some alternatives include "was credited with", "was associated with", or "was assigned to". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "is attributed with" instead of "was attributed with"?

The correct form depends on the context. "Is attributed with" is used for present or ongoing associations, while "was attributed with" is used for past associations or events.

What's the difference between "was attributed with" and "was caused by"?

"Was attributed with" suggests an association or perceived origin, while "was caused by" indicates a direct causal relationship. Use "was attributed with" when you're indicating a belief or association, and "was caused by" when you're stating a direct cause.