Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was ascertained

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was ascertained" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It essentially means that something has been definitively determined or established. For example, "The cause of the fire was ascertained to be an electrical spark."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Lipoperoxidation was ascertained by the formation of MDA.

Covalent attachment of AQ on graphene was ascertained.

In 19 cases, authorities said this fact was ascertained during the encounter.

News & Media

The Guardian

Moreover, the absence of low-level contamination was ascertained using Kraken v 0.10.552.

Science & Research

Nature

Preconceptional obesity, defined as BMI 30 kg m−2, was ascertained through standardized questionnaires.

Science & Research

Nature

The rumor that the vacation would be in the Caribbean was ascertained to be hard fact.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Presence of Howell-Jolly bodies was ascertained on laboratory tests.

Prenatal antibiotic use was ascertained through maternal self-report.

Thus, the stability-indicating power of this approach was ascertained.

In both cultivars, the occurrence of X. fastidiosa was ascertained.

The accuracy of the method was ascertained by recovery method.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was ascertained" when you want to emphasize that something has been definitively established after careful investigation or analysis. It lends a formal and authoritative tone to your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "was ascertained" in casual or informal writing. Opt for simpler alternatives like "found out" or "discovered" to maintain a natural tone.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was ascertained" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a piece of information or a fact has been definitively established or discovered through a process of investigation or analysis. Ludwig confirms its proper usage and contextual relevance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

83%

News & Media

9%

Academia

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was ascertained" is a grammatically correct and widely used expression that conveys the definitive establishment of a fact through investigation. As Ludwig AI confirms, it’s most appropriate for formal and scientific writing where precision and authority are important. While versatile, it should be replaced with simpler terms like "found out" or "discovered" in informal contexts to maintain a natural tone. Remember to use "was ascertained" when you want to emphasize certainty and avoid ambiguity in your communication.

FAQs

How can I use "was ascertained" in a sentence?

The phrase "was ascertained" is used to indicate that something has been definitively determined or established after investigation. For example, "The cause of the error "was ascertained" after a thorough review of the logs."

What are some alternatives to "was ascertained"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "was determined", "was established", "was discovered", or "was found".

Is "was ascertained" too formal for everyday writing?

Yes, "was ascertained" is generally considered formal and is best suited for academic, scientific, or professional contexts. In everyday writing, simpler alternatives are usually more appropriate.

What is the difference between "was ascertained" and "was assumed"?

"Was ascertained" implies a definite conclusion based on evidence or investigation, while "was assumed" indicates something was taken to be true without proof. The former is based on fact, while the latter is based on conjecture.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: