Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
was found
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"was found" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use "was found" when you are referring to someone or something having been located, discovered, or identified, such as in the sentence: "The lost toy was found in the corner of the room."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Wiki
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
"Jennifer was found there.
News & Media
Happiness was found.
News & Media
A match was found.
News & Media
Nothing conclusive was found.
News & Media
No gun was found.
News & Media
(He was found guilty).
News & Media
Still nothing was found.
News & Media
She was found dead.
News & Media
No bomb was found.
News & Media
The man was found.
News & Media
No intruder was found.
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "was found" to clearly indicate a passive discovery or identification. Ensure the subject receiving the action is clearly stated.
Common error
Avoid using active voice when the focus should be on the object discovered, not the discoverer. For example, instead of "They found the treasure", use "The treasure "was found"" to emphasize the treasure.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "was found" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence received the action of being discovered or located. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage in various contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
55%
Academia
15%
Science
15%
Less common in
Wiki
8%
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
5%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "was found" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive voice construction that indicates a discovery or location. Ludwig AI validates this, showcasing its prevalence across various sources. It is most commonly seen in news and media, academic writing, and scientific publications. While "was found" is a versatile phrase, be mindful of using active voice when the focus should be on the actor. Alternatives such as "has been discovered", "was located", and "turned up" can be used for semantic variation.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
was identified
Emphasizes the act of recognizing or determining what something is.
was located
Focuses on the physical positioning of something that was found.
has been discovered
Replaces the passive voice with a present perfect passive construction, emphasizing the recent nature of the discovery.
has been ascertained
Offers a more formal and definitive tone, implying that something has been established with certainty.
was detected
Highlights the use of technical means or observation to find something that was not immediately apparent.
turned up
Uses a phrasal verb to indicate the finding or locating of something, often unexpectedly.
proved to be
Indicates that something was found to have certain qualities or characteristics.
emerged
Suggests something came into view or became known after being hidden or unclear.
materialized
Implies something became real or appeared, often after a period of anticipation or searching.
was unearthed
Suggests discovery through investigation or digging, often used metaphorically.
FAQs
How do I use "was found" in a sentence?
Use "was found" to indicate that something or someone was discovered or located by an unspecified actor. For example, "The missing artifact "was found" in the museum's storage room".
What can I say instead of "was found"?
You can use alternatives like "has been discovered", "was located", or "turned up" depending on the context.
Is it correct to say "was find" instead of "was found"?
No, "was find" is grammatically incorrect. The correct passive past participle form of "find" is "found". Therefore, the correct phrase is "was found".
What is the difference between "was found" and "is found"?
"Was found" refers to a past event where something was discovered, while "is found" refers to a present state of being located or a general truth. For example, "The solution "was found" yesterday", versus "The solution "is found" in this manual".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested