was analysed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was analysed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are describing an action that has been completed in the past, particularly in academic or analytical writing. Example: "The data was analysed to determine the trends over the last decade."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A total of 176 sectors was analysed.

Nature

Each tumour sample was analysed in triplicates.

Nature

Each sample was analysed in quadruplicate.

Nature

Data was analysed using R and BioConductor.

Nature

The data was analysed descriptively.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

I can not imagine how the inventory report was analysed.

Cornell University

What was "analysed" were performances, not policies or their absence.

The Guardian

Her Facebook page was analysed, her photographs, her comments.

The Guardian

The dynamics of both models was analysed.

Neurocomputing

Each sample was analysed in triplicate for each gene study.

Nature

The resulting gene list was analysed by IPA.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was analysed" when you want to emphasize that a thorough examination or evaluation has been completed. Ensure that the subject of the sentence clearly indicates what was being analysed.

Common error

Avoid overuse of passive voice constructions like "was analysed" if it obscures who performed the analysis. In many cases, active voice provides clarity and conciseness: "The researchers analysed the data" is stronger than "The data was analysed."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was analysed" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that a subject underwent analysis. It is used to describe a completed action where the focus is on the object of the analysis rather than the actor. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this passive construction is suitable in several scenarios.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

73%

News & Media

13%

Academia

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was analysed" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, predominantly in scientific and formal contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, demonstrating its common usage across a broad spectrum of sources. While "was analysed" effectively conveys that a subject has undergone examination, remember to consider the clarity and impact of your writing by using the active voice whenever possible. Alternatives like "was examined" or "was evaluated" offer subtle variations in meaning, suitable for different contexts. By following these guidelines, you can ensure that your use of "was analysed" is both accurate and effective.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was examined

Replaces "analysed" with a more general term for careful inspection.

was evaluated

Suggests a judgment or assessment was made after the analysis.

was assessed

Similar to evaluated, but often implies a formal or systematic appraisal.

was investigated

Indicates a more in-depth inquiry or investigation took place.

was studied

Implies a thorough review and learning process.

was inspected

Focuses on a detailed visual or physical examination.

was checked

Suggests a verification or confirmation process.

was reviewed

Indicates a critical assessment or overview was conducted.

was scrutinized

Implies a very careful and critical examination.

was dissected

Suggests a detailed breakdown and examination of the components.

FAQs

How can I use "was analysed" in a sentence?

The phrase "was analysed" is used to indicate that something has been examined in detail. For example: "The data "was analysed" using statistical software."

What are some alternatives to "was analysed"?

Alternatives include "was examined", "was evaluated", or "was assessed". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "analyse"?

While "was analysed" (passive voice) is grammatically correct, using the active voice (e.g., "The researchers analysed...") can often make your writing clearer and more direct. Choose the voice that best suits the context and your desired emphasis.

What's the difference between "was analysed" and "was studied"?

"Was analysed" implies a detailed examination to understand the components or characteristics, while "was studied" suggests a broader investigation. For example, a sample "was analysed" for its chemical composition, but a historical event "was studied" for its causes and consequences.