was evaluated

USAGE SUMMARY

"was evaluated" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are discussing the assessment of something or someone. For example: "The student's test scores were evaluated in relation to the school's standard for passing."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The interaction term was evaluated.

Nature

It was evaluated positively by paramedics.

The Guardian

Statistical significance was evaluated at P < 0.05.

Nature

[Ca2+]m was evaluated as fluorescence increase.

Nature

Growth was evaluated periodically by measuring OD600.

Nature

Transfection efficiency was evaluated by RT-qPCR.

Nature

Settlement was evaluated every 30 minutes.

Nature

Apoptosis was evaluated immunohistochemically.

Journal of Microscopy and Ultrastructure

Johnson was evaluated at the infield care center and released.

The New York Times

This was the only time I was evaluated.

The New Yorker

He was evaluated and all preliminary tests were normal.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was evaluated", ensure the context clearly indicates the criteria or standards against which the subject was judged. For example, "The student's performance was evaluated based on a rubric."

Common error

Avoid vague statements like "The program was evaluated." Instead, specify what aspects were evaluated and by whom. For instance, "The program's effectiveness was evaluated by an independent panel of experts using pre-defined metrics."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was evaluated" functions as a passive voice construction of the verb 'evaluate'. It indicates that the subject of the sentence underwent a process of assessment or judgment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

23%

Academia

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was evaluated" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction signifying that something has undergone assessment or judgment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness for general English usage. It finds prominence in scientific, academic, and news-related contexts. When employing "was evaluated", clarity is paramount, ensuring the evaluation criteria and responsible parties are explicitly stated. Alternatives like ""was assessed"" or ""was examined"" can be used depending on the nuance required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was assessed

Replaces "evaluated" with a direct synonym, maintaining a similar formal tone.

was assessed and judged

Adds emphasis on the decision-making aspect of evaluation.

was examined

Focuses on a detailed inspection, implying a thorough review.

was investigated

Suggests a more in-depth inquiry, often for problem-solving.

was determined

Emphasizes reaching a definitive conclusion after considering factors.

was measured

Highlights a quantitative aspect of evaluation, focusing on measurable results.

was rated

Implies placing something on a specific scale or hierarchy.

was appraised

Focuses on judging the worth or quality of something.

was analyzed

Highlights a systematic examination of something to interpret and explain it.

underwent evaluation

Shifts the focus to the process of evaluation rather than the result.

FAQs

How do I use "was evaluated" in a sentence?

Use "was evaluated" to describe something that has undergone assessment. For example, "The product design "was evaluated" based on user feedback."

What are some alternatives to "was evaluated"?

Alternatives include "was assessed", "was examined", or "was investigated", depending on the context.

What's the difference between "was evaluated" and "was assessed"?

"Was evaluated" generally implies a broader judgment, while ""was assessed"" often refers to a more specific measurement or appraisal. However, they are often used interchangeably.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when writing about evaluations?

While passive voice is common in scientific writing, active voice can be more direct and engaging. Instead of "The data "was evaluated" by the team", consider "The team evaluated the data."