Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was already known

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was already known" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something was previously recognized or understood before a certain point in time. Example: "The results of the experiment were surprising, but the potential risks associated with the procedure was already known to the researchers."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Most results confirm what was already known.

News & Media

The Economist

Holmes was already known for his jab.

News & Media

The New Yorker

But that much was already known.

Mostly the segment recapped what was already known.

News & Media

The New York Times

And he was already known for leaving things unfinished.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It was already known in the mid-19th century.

News & Media

The New York Times

I was already known for hard hitting, honest books.

News & Media

The Guardian

Unfortunately, the man was already known to Italian intelligence.

News & Media

The Economist

Mr. Nakoula was already known to federal authorities.

News & Media

The New York Times

He was already known as an eloquent evangelist.

In 1970, DeMatha was already known for its basketball program.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was already known" to emphasize that a piece of information was not new or surprising, particularly when contrasting it with a new discovery or development.

Common error

Avoid using "was already known" when the context already implies prior knowledge. For example, instead of saying "The commonly accepted fact was already known", simply state "The commonly accepted fact" to avoid redundancy.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was already known" functions as a verbal phrase indicating a state of prior awareness or understanding. According to Ludwig, its presence in sentences helps to emphasize that a particular fact, concept, or piece of information was not new or surprising within a given context. The examples showcase its function across diverse subjects.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

39%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was already known" is a versatile verbal phrase used to indicate that information was previously understood or recognized. Ludwig's AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage across various contexts, particularly in news, scientific, and encyclopedic content. While generally neutral in register, it’s essential to avoid redundancy by ensuring its use adds value to the sentence. Related phrases like "had been previously established" or "was common knowledge" can provide nuanced alternatives based on the specific context. It is important to use this phrase to highlight something that wasn't novel in a specific situation, while avoiding stating what is obvious.

FAQs

How can I use "was already known" in a sentence?

You can use "was already known" to indicate that something was previously recognized or understood. For instance, "The risks of the surgery "were already known" to the patient before the procedure".

What are some alternatives to "was already known"?

Some alternatives include "was previously understood", "was common knowledge", or "had been established" depending on the specific context.

Is it always necessary to include "already" in the phrase "was known"?

No, the word "already" is not always necessary. Omitting "already" still conveys that something "was known", but including it emphasizes the fact that it was known before a particular point in time.

What's the difference between "was already known" and "was originally known"?

"Was already known" indicates something that was previously known at a specific point, while "was originally known" indicates what something was known as at its inception or beginning.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.6/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: