was administered to

USAGE SUMMARY

"was administered to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to someone carrying out an action involving medication or another type of treatment on somebody else. For example: The flu vaccine was administered to all members of the family.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Quinine was administered to lower the fever.

Yale University

was administered to group II only.

Mutation Research-Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis

The lethal injection was administered to McVeigh's right leg.

The Guardian

In addition, the TMT was administered to 83 participants.

Nature

Play was stopped while Roth was administered to.

The Washington Post

Adjuvant radiotherapy was administered to 65 patients (20%).

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Edinburgh Handedness Inventory was administered to all participants.

Asian Journal of Psychiatry

The survey was administered to 1587 males attending eleven colleges.

Social Science & Medicine

The inventory was administered to all the subjects.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

No intervention was administered to the control group.

Nurse Education Today

A socio-demographic survey was administered to 162 participants.

International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was administered to", ensure the context clearly indicates who performed the action and who or what received it. Clarity is key, especially in medical or research contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "was administered to" in situations where the actor is unclear. If the administrator is unknown or unimportant, passive voice is acceptable. However, if the actor is relevant, use active voice for clarity. For example, instead of "The drug was administered to the patient", consider "The doctor administered the drug to the patient".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was administered to" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone or something received a specific treatment, test, or substance. It emphasizes the recipient of the action rather than the actor. This is supported by Ludwig AI analysis.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

77%

News & Media

13%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was administered to" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive construction indicating that a treatment, test, or substance was provided to someone or something. As highlighted by Ludwig AI, it is most commonly found in scientific, medical, and formal contexts. While the phrase is generally clear, it's important to ensure that the context makes the actor (the one administering) clear, especially in situations where the administrator's identity is relevant. Alternative phrasing, such as "was given to" or "was applied to", can be considered depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was given to

Focuses on the act of giving, which can be a broader term than administering, but shares the core meaning of providing something.

was provided to

Highlights the act of supplying or making something available, similar to administering in the sense of offering a resource.

was treated with

Specifically used when referring to medical or therapeutic treatments, offering a more direct synonym in those contexts.

was applied to

Emphasizes the act of applying something directly, often implying a more physical application than "administered".

was dispensed to

Specifically refers to distributing something, often in controlled portions, like medication.

was supplied to

Focuses on the act of furnishing or providing what is needed, similar to administering in contexts where a need is being met.

was allocated to

Highlights the act of distributing resources or assigning something for a specific purpose.

was issued to

Implies a formal or official act of giving or providing, often in an official capacity.

received

Indicates that someone or something was the recipient of an action. Active voice, whereas "was administered to" is passive.

underwent

Implies that someone or something experienced something, especially a medical procedure or test. Active voice, whereas "was administered to" is passive.

FAQs

How can I use "was administered to" in a sentence?

The phrase "was administered to" indicates that something (like medication, a survey, or a test) was given or applied to someone or something. For example, "The vaccine "was administered to" all participants in the study".

What are some alternatives to "was administered to"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "was given to", "was provided to", or "was applied to" instead of "was administered to".

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was administered to"?

While "was administered to" is in the passive voice, it's useful when the recipient of the action is more important than the administrator. However, using active voice (e.g., "The nurse administered the medication") can provide more clarity if the administrator is relevant.

When is it appropriate to use "was administered to" in formal writing?

"Was administered to" is suitable for formal writing, especially in scientific, medical, or official contexts where precise language is necessary. It conveys a specific action of providing or applying something in a controlled manner.