was provided to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "was provided to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to talk about someone receiving something from someone else. For example: "The students were provided with books and materials to help them with their studies."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This information was provided to your newspaper.

The New York Times

A copy was provided to The New York Times.

The New York Times

An advance copy was provided to The New York Times.

The New York Times

A copy of the letter was provided to The Times.

The New York Times

That's the video that was provided to The Post.

The Washington Post

Financial support for this research was provided to R.Ber.

Nature

Again, no feedback was provided to the participants.

Nature

A Hindi translation was provided to every participant.

Cornell University

No information was provided to substantiate the charge.

The Washington Post

A numeric example was provided to graphically illustrate these errors.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

A case study was provided to explain the computational algorithm.

Journal of Contaminant Hydrology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was provided to", ensure the subject clearly identifies who or what received the provision. Clarity is key for effective communication.

Common error

Avoid using "was provided to" when an active voice construction is more direct and clear. For instance, instead of "Information was provided to the team by the manager", consider "The manager provided information to the team."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was provided to" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that someone or something received something from an agent. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is correct and usable. It's commonly employed to shift focus from the provider to the recipient.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

55%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was provided to" is a grammatically correct and frequently used passive voice construction. Ludwig AI confirms its validity for English writing. Predominantly found in scientific and news contexts, this phrase serves to highlight the recipient of a service, item, or information. While versatile, remember to consider whether an active voice construction might offer greater clarity and directness. Be aware of the register as "was provided to" leans towards formal, making it less appropriate for casual settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was supplied to

Replaces 'provided' with 'supplied', suggesting a more formal or logistical context.

was made available to

Emphasizes the accessibility or readiness of something.

was given to

Uses a simpler verb, 'given', making the phrase more informal and direct.

was offered to

Suggests that something was made available, implying a choice or opportunity.

was furnished to

Replaces 'provided' with 'furnished', indicating a more complete or equipped provision.

was delivered to

Highlights the act of transporting or conveying something to a specific location or recipient.

was allocated to

Implies a formal distribution or assignment of resources.

was granted to

Suggests permission or authorization was given alongside the provision.

was presented to

Suggests a formal or ceremonial offering.

was transferred to

Emphasizes the movement or shift of something from one entity to another.

FAQs

How can I use "was provided to" in a sentence?

Use "was provided to" to indicate that something was given or made available to someone. For example, "Assistance "was provided to" the victims of the flood".

What are some alternatives to "was provided to"?

You can use alternatives such as "was given to", "was supplied to", or "was offered to" depending on the context.

Is it better to use active or passive voice with "was provided to"?

While "was provided to" is grammatically correct, using the active voice can often make your writing more direct. For example, instead of "Support "was provided to" the team", you could say "We provided support to the team".

How does "was provided to" differ from "was offered to"?

"Was offered to" implies that something was made available but not necessarily accepted, whereas ""was provided to"" suggests that something was actually given or supplied. For instance, "Assistance was offered to them, but they refused it" versus "Assistance "was provided to" them immediately".