was acquired from

USAGE SUMMARY

"was acquired from" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used when describing how someone acquired an item or piece of information. For example: "The information about the company's finances was acquired from an anonymous source."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

RHA was acquired from local industry.

Construction and Building Materials

Conine was acquired from Baltimore in a trade late Sunday.

The New York Times - Sports

He was acquired from the Pacers in July.

The New York Times - Sports

Film of that 1984 game was acquired from NFL Films.

The New York Times - Sports

Arron Asham was acquired from Montreal for Mariusz Czerkawski.

The New York Times - Sports

The bathymetry was acquired from 1′ topography database23.

Nature

Thermus thermophilus DNA polymerase was acquired from Biotools.

Nature

BLM was acquired from Nippon Kayaku (Tokyo, Japan).

Nature

pCR™ 2.1-TOPO® vector was acquired from Invitrogen.

Nature

Kemp was acquired from the Rams in the offseason.

The New York Times - Sports

The information was acquired from hospital records and panoramic radiographs.

British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was acquired from", ensure the source is clearly identified to provide context and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was acquired from" without specifying the source. Always provide a clear reference to where the information or item originated to avoid ambiguity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was acquired from" functions as a passive construction indicating the source of something. It specifies where an item, information, or resource originated, as shown in Ludwig's examples, where materials, data, or even people are described in terms of their source.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

28%

Academia

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was acquired from" is a versatile phrase used to indicate the source or origin of an item, information, or resource. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and widely used, especially in scientific and news contexts. When using this phrase, it's important to clearly identify the source to maintain transparency and credibility. While alternatives like "was obtained from" or "was sourced from" exist, "was acquired from" suggests a more deliberate acquisition process. Remember to always specify the source when using this phrase to avoid any ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was obtained from

Replaces "acquired" with a more general term for receiving something.

was sourced from

Emphasizes the origin or supplier of the item.

was purchased from

Specifies that the item was obtained through a purchase.

was received from

Highlights the act of receiving something from a source.

was derived from

Suggests that the item originated or was developed from a source.

was furnished by

Implies providing or supplying something needed.

was provided by

Focuses on the act of providing something to someone.

was supplied by

Indicates a formal provision of materials or resources.

was secured from

Highlights the effort or process of getting something from a source.

was extracted from

Specifies that the item was taken or drawn out from something else.

FAQs

How can I use "was acquired from" in a sentence?

Use "was acquired from" to indicate the origin or source of something. For example, "The data "was acquired from" a research study".

What are some alternatives to "was acquired from"?

You can use alternatives like "was obtained from", "was sourced from", or "was purchased from depending on the specific context.

Is it better to use "was acquired from" or "was obtained from"?

Both phrases are correct, but ""was acquired from"" often implies a more deliberate or formal process of obtaining something, while "was obtained from" is more general.

What is the difference between "was acquired from" and "was derived from"?

""was acquired from"" indicates the source from which something was directly taken, whereas "was derived from" suggests that something was developed or originated from a particular source or process.