was accepted by

USAGE SUMMARY

"was accepted by" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used when you want to indicate that something or someone was accepted or approved by an authority. For example: "My application for the job was accepted by the hiring committee."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This was accepted by the independent commissioner.

Independent

It was accepted by Farrar & Rinehart.

The New Yorker

This offer was accepted by the plaintiff.

Cornell University

Soon after, it was accepted by Berlin.

The Guardian - Film

At 18, she was accepted by Rada.

The Guardian - Film

The optimally trimmed fruit was accepted by growers and traders.

Biosystems Engineering

In 1977, she was accepted by Columbia University's medical school.

The New York Times

She added that this was accepted by police.

The Guardian

I was accepted by exactly one insurance company.

The New York Times

Neither offer was accepted by the C.I.A., the report said.

The New York Times

The story was accepted by a prominent magazine.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Make use of active voice alternatives, especially in contexts where you aim to emphasize who did the accepting. E.g. Instead of saying "The proposal was accepted by the board" say "The board accepted the proposal".

Common error

Overusing passive voice constructions like "was accepted by" can make writing seem indirect and less engaging. When possible, opt for active voice to clearly show who is performing the action.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was accepted by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that the subject of the sentence received approval or agreement from the entity specified after "by". Ludwig's examples showcase its use across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

33%

Academia

12%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was accepted by" is a grammatically sound and very common passive voice phrase used to indicate approval or agreement from a specified entity. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and usability. It appears most frequently in news, science, and academic contexts. While generally neutral in tone, it can lean towards formal or professional depending on the specific source. When using this phrase, ensure clarity about the subject and context of acceptance, and consider active voice alternatives for a more direct writing style.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was approved by

This alternative suggests a formal endorsement or authorization.

was agreed to by

This alternative emphasizes mutual agreement or consensus.

was ratified by

This suggests a formal validation, often in legal or political contexts.

was endorsed by

Implies a public declaration of support or approval.

was sanctioned by

Indicates official permission or authorization, often by an authority.

was embraced by

This suggests enthusiastic adoption or support.

was received favorably by

Indicates a positive reaction or welcome.

was taken up by

Suggests adoption or implementation of an idea or proposal.

was welcomed by

Implies a warm or positive reception.

was validated by

Suggests confirmation or verification of something.

FAQs

What does "was accepted by" mean?

The phrase "was accepted by" means that something or someone has been approved, agreed upon, or received favorably by a particular entity or group. It implies that the entity has given its consent or endorsement.

How can I use "was accepted by" in a sentence?

You can use "was accepted by" to indicate that something has been approved or agreed upon. For example: "The offer "was accepted by" the plaintiff" or "The proposal "was accepted by" the board members".

What are some alternatives to "was accepted by"?

Alternatives to "was accepted by" include "was approved by", "was agreed to by", "was endorsed by", or "was ratified by". The choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to use active or passive voice when using "was accepted by"?

While "was accepted by" is grammatically correct (passive voice), using the active voice can often make your writing clearer and more direct. For example, instead of "The proposal was accepted by the committee", you could say "The committee accepted the proposal".