Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was abstracted from

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was abstracted from" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that was taken out of a larger source. For example: "The data used in this study was abstracted from a larger database of customer records."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Utilization was abstracted from clinical records.

Information was abstracted from 2,938 injury-related, ED visits (132.7 visits/1,000 person-years).

Diagnostic and treatment information was abstracted from the original patient records.

All information was abstracted from medical charts.

Information on HDP including gestational hypertension and preeclampsia was abstracted from medical records.

Further data regarding presentation, diagnostic studies, and clinical course was abstracted from medical records.

Demographic and clinical data from eligible patients was abstracted from the electronic medical record.

Clinical and follow-up information was abstracted from medical records.

Science

Plosone

Information prior to study enrollment was abstracted from medical records.

Science

Plosone

Birth weight was abstracted from obstetric records.

Science

Bone

Infant sex was abstracted from medical records.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "was abstracted from" when you want to emphasize that specific data or information was carefully selected and removed from a larger source. Be precise about the original source to maintain clarity and credibility.

Common error

Avoid using "was abstracted from" in casual writing. Simpler alternatives like "taken from" or "from" are often more appropriate for informal contexts.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was abstracted from" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that data or information has been carefully selected and removed from a larger source. Ludwig's examples show its prevalent use in scientific and academic contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

Academia

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "was abstracted from" is a common and grammatically correct passive construction primarily used in formal and scientific writing. As Ludwig AI confirms, it signifies that specific information has been carefully selected and removed from a larger source. Its usage is most frequent in scientific publications and academic papers, where precise language and clear sourcing are essential. While versatile, it's best to avoid using "was abstracted from" in informal writing where simpler alternatives like "taken from" may be more appropriate. Remember to clearly identify the source when using this phrase to maintain transparency and credibility.

FAQs

How can I use "was abstracted from" in a sentence?

Use "was abstracted from" to indicate that specific information has been carefully selected and removed from a larger body of data. For example, "The patient's medical history "was abstracted from" their complete medical record".

What are some alternatives to "was abstracted from"?

You can use alternatives like "was derived from", "was extracted from", or "was taken from" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "data was abstracted from" or "data were abstracted from"?

Because "data" is technically the plural of "datum", "data were abstracted from" is grammatically correct. However, "data was abstracted from" is widely accepted and commonly used, especially in less formal contexts.

What is the difference between "was abstracted from" and "was extracted from"?

"Was extracted from" generally refers to physically or digitally removing something, while "was abstracted from" refers to selecting specific, relevant information. The two phrases are largely interchangeable, yet their technical application varies, for example: Oil "was extracted from" the ground, whereas the key findings "was abstracted from" the study.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: