was extracted from

USAGE SUMMARY

The term "was extracted from" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that has been taken from a larger source. For example: Research data was extracted from previous experiments.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I was extracted from them".

The New Yorker

This was extracted from hundreds of reports.

Yale University

Collagen was extracted from rat's tail.

Burns

Birth weight was extracted from medical records.

Social Science & Medicine

DNA was extracted from peripheral blood.

Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research

This "essence" was extracted from Bruno with difficulty.

The Guardian - Film

RNA was extracted from pooled dura mater for microarray analysis.

Stanford University

The dataset was extracted from mobiDB database version 1.270.

Nature

The map layer was extracted from GADM version 1.072.

Nature

Germline DNA was extracted from matched peripheral mononuclear cells.

Nature

RNA was extracted from 100 mg of sampled tissues.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "was extracted from", ensure the context clearly indicates the source and the method or process by which the extraction occurred. This enhances clarity and precision in your writing.

Common error

While "was extracted from" is perfectly acceptable, avoid overusing it in informal writing. In less formal contexts, consider alternatives like "was taken from" or "came from" to maintain a natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was extracted from" functions as a passive construction indicating the source of something. It highlights that an element or piece of information has been removed or derived from a larger context. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is suitable for use in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

66%

News & Media

15%

Academia

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

1%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "was extracted from" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that serves to indicate the source of information or materials. Ludwig AI validates its usability in written English. Predominantly found in scientific, news, and academic contexts, it denotes a formal register. For more informal settings, consider alternatives like "was taken from". Remember to use the phrase when you want to highlight the process of obtaining something carefully and precisely from a particular source.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was obtained from

Replaces "extracted" with "obtained", implying a less forceful or technical acquisition.

was derived from

Indicates that something originates or is based on something else.

was taken from

A more general and less formal way of saying something was obtained from a source.

was sourced from

Emphasizes the origin or supplier of something.

was gathered from

Suggests a collection of information or materials from multiple places.

was acquired from

Implies gaining possession of something, often through a deliberate effort.

was drawn from

Suggests that something was taken or inferred from a particular source.

was isolated from

Implies separating a specific element from a larger mixture or environment.

was retrieved from

Suggests recovering something that was previously stored or lost.

was mined from

Implies a more intensive or laborious process of obtaining something.

FAQs

How can I use "was extracted from" in a sentence?

Use "was extracted from" to indicate that something was removed or obtained from a source. For example, "The data was extracted from the report" or "The quote was extracted from the interview".

What are some alternatives to "was extracted from"?

You can use alternatives such as "was obtained from", "was derived from", or "was taken from" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "was extracted from"?

"Was extracted from" is appropriate when you want to emphasize a process of careful or technical removal of something from a source. It's often used in scientific or formal contexts.

Is "was extracted from" formal or informal?

"Was extracted from" leans toward the formal side. While it's acceptable in various contexts, more informal alternatives like "was taken from" may be preferable in casual writing.