verified with

USAGE SUMMARY

"verified with" is correct and usable in written English.
It is a phrase used to indicate that something has been confirmed as true. Example: The documents were verified with the original signatures.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These are verified with a nominal transaction.

The Economist

The account could not be verified with the Chinese authorities.

The New York Times

Colonies were verified with diagnostic PCR.

AMB Express

Each fusion was verified with DNA-sequencing.

Botanical Studies

Throughput analysis is verified with OPNET simulations.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Simulated results are verified with experimental results.

Measurement

The model was verified with three cases.

Ecological Modelling

The solution set is verified with experiments.

Journal of Materials Processing Technology

Simulated results are verified with measured results.

AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications

Analytical results are verified with numerical simulations.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

The MCCR model was verified with good results (Sallam 2016).

Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "verified with", specify the method or tool used for verification to enhance clarity and credibility. For example, "The results were verified with RT-PCR".

Common error

Avoid using "verified with" without specifying the means of verification. Saying "It was verified" lacks necessary context; instead, clarify "It was verified with DNA sequencing."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "verified with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the action of confirming the truth or accuracy of something using a specific method or tool. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely employed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "verified with" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase that indicates confirmation or validation through a specific method or tool. As Ludwig AI confirms, its usage is prevalent across scientific and news contexts, emphasizing the reliability of information. To enhance clarity, specify the verification method when using this phrase. Alternatives include "confirmed by", "validated by", and "corroborated by". Remember to avoid ambiguity by always stating how something was verified.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

confirmed by

Focuses on the act of establishing truth or accuracy through evidence.

validated by

Emphasizes the process of checking or proving the validity or accuracy of something.

corroborated by

Highlights the strengthening or support of a statement or theory with additional evidence.

authenticated through

Suggests that something has been proven genuine.

substantiated by

Indicates that something has been supported with sufficient evidence.

supported by

Implies that something is backed up or maintained by evidence.

attested by

Stresses that something is declared to be true or genuine.

demonstrated by

Focuses on showing the existence or truth of something through evidence or example.

checked against

Implies a comparison to an accepted standard or reference to ensure accuracy.

proven with

Emphasizes that something has been definitively shown to be true using specific evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "verified with" in a sentence?

Use "verified with" to indicate that something has been confirmed or validated by a specific method or source. For example, "The model was "verified with" three cases".

What are some alternatives to "verified with"?

You can use alternatives such as "confirmed by", "validated by", or "corroborated by", depending on the context.

Is it better to say "verified with" or "confirmed with"?

Both "verified with" and "confirmed with" are correct, but "verified with" often implies a more rigorous or technical process of validation, while "confirmed with" can suggest a more general agreement or corroboration. It depends on the context.

What does it mean when something is "verified with" a specific tool or method?

It means that the accuracy or truth of something has been checked and confirmed using that specific tool or method. For example, "Results were "verified with" real-time PCR" indicates that the results were confirmed using real-time polymerase chain reaction.