to a maximum of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "to a maximum of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate a limit or cap on a quantity or amount. Example: "Participants are allowed to submit entries to a maximum of three times."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

Purchases are limited to a maximum of four per order.

The Guardian - Music

Other union members agreed to a maximum of 8 hours.

The New York Times

So they stuck to a maximum of $2,000.

The New York Times

"I will limit myself to a maximum of eight years.

Independent

These have swelled to a maximum of £9,000.

The Economist

Each could have been sentenced to a maximum of five years.

The New York Times - Sports

The fines, currently at $25, would be raised to a maximum of $150.

The New York Times

He was convicted of sodomy and sentenced to a maximum of 25 years.

The New York Times

The agreements announced today allow debts to rise to a maximum of six times Ebitda.

The New York Times

The fees amount to $2.50 per flight segment, up to a maximum of $10 a ticket.

The New York Times - Travel

Criminal penalties would increase to a maximum of five years in prison, from two years.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "to a maximum of", ensure the context clearly indicates what the maximum applies to. For example, specify units (e.g., "to a maximum of 10 kilograms") for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "to a maximum of" without specifying what the limit refers to. Ambiguity can arise if the context doesn't clearly establish the unit or scope of the maximum value.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "to a maximum of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb, indicating an upper limit or restriction. Ludwig's examples show its use in diverse contexts like finance, law, and everyday situations. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

13%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "to a maximum of" serves to define a clear upper limit or constraint, appearing most frequently in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. Ludwig AI validates its grammatical correctness, and the numerous examples provided by Ludwig showcase its versatile application across various scenarios. When employing this phrase, remember to specify the units or scope to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives such as "up to a limit of" or "not exceeding" can be used to vary your language while maintaining clarity. The phrase is widely used in formal and informal English, although the register tends to lean towards the formal side.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Up to a limit of

Replaces "maximum" with "limit", emphasizing the constraint.

Not exceeding

Uses a negative construction to express the upper bound.

Capped at

Emphasizes the idea of a firm upper boundary.

Limited to

Focuses on the restriction being imposed.

With a ceiling of

Uses "ceiling" as a metaphor for the upper limit.

At most

A concise way to indicate the highest permissible amount.

No more than

Similar to "at most" but with a slightly different emphasis.

Subject to a maximum of

Adds formality by including "subject to".

Restricted to a maximum of

Highlights that the limit is enforced.

Not greater than

Uses a formal tone to set an upper boundary.

FAQs

How can I use "to a maximum of" in a sentence?

Use "to a maximum of" to specify an upper limit for something. For example, "You can contribute "to a maximum of" $5,000" means $5,000 is the highest amount allowed.

What are some alternatives to "to a maximum of"?

Alternatives include "up to a limit of", "not exceeding", or "capped at". The choice depends on the desired level of formality and emphasis.

Is it grammatically correct to say "up to a maximum of"?

Yes, "up to a maximum of" is grammatically correct, although "to a maximum of" is more concise. Both phrases are used to indicate an upper limit.

What's the difference between "to a maximum of" and "at most"?

"To a maximum of" is generally used when specifying a formal limit, while "at most" is a more informal way of indicating that something will not exceed a certain amount. For example, "Attendance will be limited "to a maximum of" 100 people" versus "There will be "at most" 10 people present".