the first part

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "the first part" is acceptable in written English.
You can use it to refer to the first portion of something that is divided into many sections. For example, "In the first part of this article, we discussed the background of the situation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

This is the first part.

The New York Times

Crosby embodies the first part.

Independent

The first part was easy.

The Economist

The first part isn't so difficult.

The New Yorker

But what of the first part?

Independent

The first part is a problem.

The New York Times

"The first part was chaotic and disorganized.

The New York Times

The first part chronicles Sharp's career.

The New Yorker

Wieters was right about the first part.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

2 human-written examples

That's the first part your credibility.

Forbes

The first part is obvious.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "the first part" to clearly delineate the initial section of an argument, ensuring the reader knows it's the start of a larger discussion.

Common error

Avoid using "the first part" without clearly defining or referencing the other parts of the whole. This can leave the reader without the complete picture.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "the first part" functions primarily as a determiner phrase, specifically identifying the initial segment or section of a larger entity, process, or discussion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a commonly accepted and used phrase in English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

32%

Academia

13%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Formal & Business

5%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "the first part" is a versatile and commonly used expression to denote the beginning section of a topic, process, or item. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is grammatically correct and acceptable in written English. With the analysis of many examples, we have determined that it's most frequently found in news, scientific, and academic contexts. When using "the first part", ensure that the subsequent sections are clearly indicated to avoid ambiguity. Considering alternatives such as "the initial section" or "the opening segment" can provide variety in your writing. Remember to maintain clarity by referencing subsequent parts whenever referencing "the first part".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

the initial section

Replaces "part" with "section", emphasizing a distinct segment.

the opening segment

Substitutes "part" with "segment", highlighting the beginning nature.

the beginning portion

Uses "portion" instead of "part", referring to an amount or share of something.

the introductory section

Specifies the section as being introductory, clarifying its purpose.

the primary segment

Emphasizes that the segment is of greatest importance.

the foremost portion

Replaces "first" with "foremost", indicating prominence or priority.

the early stage

Changes "part" to "stage", depicting a point in a process or development.

the initial phase

Substitutes "part" with "phase", stressing a distinct period in a process.

part one

Simplifies the phrasing to a numerical identifier, reducing descriptive language.

the preceding section

Refers to the section that came before, contrasting with subsequent parts.

FAQs

How can I use "the first part" in a sentence?

Use "the first part" to introduce the initial segment of a topic or process that's divided into multiple sections. For example, "The first part of the experiment involves gathering the necessary materials."

What are some alternatives to using "the first part"?

Alternatives include "the initial section", "the opening segment", or "the beginning portion" depending on the specific context and emphasis you want to convey.

Is it necessary to always mention the second part after referring to "the first part"?

While not strictly necessary, mentioning or implying the existence of subsequent parts provides clarity and context for the reader. Omitting any reference to the remaining sections may lead to confusion.

What's the difference between "the first part" and "the initial stage"?

"The first part" refers to a section of something, while "the initial stage" refers to a phase in a process or development. The best choice depends on whether you are dividing a topic or describing a progression.