Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
tested contribution
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "tested contribution" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are referring to a contribution that has been evaluated or assessed for its effectiveness or impact. Example: "The research team presented their findings on the tested contribution of community programs to local development."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
We encourage users to write their own plugins, and we hope to follow a model like Fiji, where the most useful and well tested contributions from the community are bundled in later releases of MorphoGraphX itself.
Science
(D ) Example cell from dynamic-clamp experiments to test contributions of inhibitory synaptic input to rod → cone interactions in spike output.
Science
Therefore, it is advantageous to use as low intensity as possible in "virtual lesion" studies, which aim to test contributions of focal brain areas to behaviour (e.g., sub-threshold intensity when M1 is stimulated).
Science
Moreover, we tested the contribution of radar in Landsat classification.
In addition to the original input bands from satellite observations at corresponding locations, we also tested the contribution of surrounding pixels to the MCH prediction.
We then tested the contribution of each channel sub-type to the overall Ba2+ current under varying stimulation protocols.
Science
We next tested the contribution of embryonic AspM-expressing cells to the maintenance of proliferating pools of the brain, by the selective killing of these cells.
Science
The present study tested the contribution of immune responses to HSP in the amplification of autoimmune inflammation in chronically inflamed mucosa of pediatric CD patients.
Science
We further tested the contribution of GLI repressor in the proximal epithelium by reinstating GLI3 repressor levels in the Ptc1−/−UB mutants.
Science
We tested the contribution of mtNOS to the balance maintained between mitochondrial and intermediary metabolism, by injecting siRNA nNOS into rat gastrocnemius muscles with high nNOS content.
Science
We tested the contribution of the gM cytoplasmic tail to MuHV-4 lytic replication by making recombinant viruses with varying C-terminal deletions.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing research, explicitly state the methods used to arrive at the "tested contribution". This enhances credibility and allows for replication.
Common error
Avoid claiming a "tested contribution" has a significant impact without providing the specific tests or data that support this claim. Quantify the impact whenever possible.
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "tested contribution" acts as a noun phrase where "tested" modifies the noun "contribution". It indicates a contribution that has been subjected to some form of evaluation or assessment. As Ludwig AI states, the phrase is usable in English.
Frequent in
Science
99%
Formal & Business
0%
News & Media
0%
Less common in
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "tested contribution" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase, primarily in scientific and academic contexts. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is appropriate for describing contributions that have undergone evaluation or assessment. When using this phrase, be clear about the testing methods and results to ensure clarity and credibility. Alternative phrases such as ""evaluated contribution"" or ""assessed contribution"" may be used depending on the specific context.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
evaluated contribution
Replaces "tested" with "evaluated", emphasizing a formal assessment process.
assessed contribution
Uses "assessed" to highlight the determination of the value or impact of the contribution.
validated contribution
Substitutes "tested" with "validated", focusing on confirming the accuracy or effectiveness of the contribution.
verified contribution
Replaces "tested" with "verified", indicating that the contribution has been checked for truth or correctness.
investigated contribution
Uses "investigated" to suggest a thorough examination of the contribution.
examined contribution
Replaces "tested" with "examined", implying a detailed inspection of the contribution.
analyzed contribution
Substitutes "tested" with "analyzed", emphasizing a detailed examination of the contribution's components.
measured contribution
Uses "measured" to focus on quantifying the contribution's impact.
quantified contribution
Replaces "tested" with "quantified", emphasizing the numerical assessment of the contribution.
proven contribution
Substitutes "tested" with "proven", highlighting that the contribution has been demonstrated to be effective.
FAQs
How do I use "tested contribution" in a sentence?
You can use "tested contribution" to describe an element or factor whose impact or effectiveness has been evaluated. For example: "The study examined the "tested contribution" of exercise to mental health."
What can I say instead of "tested contribution"?
Alternatives include "evaluated contribution", "assessed contribution", or "validated contribution", depending on the specific context and the type of assessment performed.
Which is correct, "tested contribution" or "contribution tested"?
"Tested contribution" is generally preferred when the testing is already completed or is being emphasized. "Contribution tested" is less common but grammatically acceptable when emphasizing that the contribution is undergoing testing.
What's the difference between "tested contribution" and "proven contribution"?
"Tested contribution" suggests an evaluation has been performed, whereas "proven contribution" implies that the contribution has been shown to be effective or beneficial through testing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
81%
Authority and reliability
4.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested