supposed to cover

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "supposed to cover" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating an expectation or obligation regarding what should be included or addressed in a particular context. Example: "The report is supposed to cover all aspects of the project, including budget and timeline."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

" 'Oh, I was supposed to cover?

The New York Times - Sports

We're supposed to cover stuff up.

The Guardian - Opinion

The guarantees were supposed to cover only civil projects.

The Guardian

Donations were supposed to cover a chunk of that project.

The Washington Post

But it is supposed to cover two years.

The Guardian

"That's supposed to cover five people," said Ms. Skaggs.

The New York Times

Newspapers are supposed to cover the news of the day.

The New York Times

The second phase R&D is supposed to cover full power, CW operation and reliability issues.

Current Applied Physics

I'm supposed to cover the monument in case the battle starts.

The New York Times

The envisaged Ricardo Franco park was supposed to cover 400,000 hectares.

The Guardian

How on earth is the media supposed to cover Trump's wacky JFK-Cruz conspiracy theory?

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "supposed to cover" when you want to indicate a duty, plan, or expectation. It is commonly employed to describe what something is intended to include or what someone is expected to manage or be responsible for.

Common error

Avoid using "supposed to cover" loosely when there's no clear basis for the expectation. Ensure it aligns with established plans, agreements, or responsibilities, or it may come off as presumptive or inaccurate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "supposed to cover" functions primarily as a modal verb phrase indicating an expectation, obligation, or planned inclusion. Ludwig AI suggests this is correct and usable in written English. It often describes what something should include or what someone is expected to do.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

2%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "supposed to cover" is a versatile expression used to convey expectations, obligations, or planned inclusions. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. It is prevalent across various contexts, including News & Media and Science, making it a valuable asset in effective communication. When using this phrase, ensure there's a clear basis for the expectation to avoid any misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

meant to include

Focuses on the intention behind the inclusion, rather than an obligation.

expected to address

Highlights anticipation rather than a requirement to deal with something.

intended to encompass

Emphasizes the scope of coverage in a more formal tone.

designed to handle

Focuses on the capability and design for managing specific aspects.

obligated to report

Highlights a mandated duty to present or disclose information.

tasked with including

Emphasizes that someone or something has been assigned a task.

required to incorporate

Implies a need for integration and formal requirement.

responsible for including

Highlights the accountability for ensuring inclusion of specific items.

undertaking to deal with

Emphasizes a commitment or promise to address something.

set to incorporate

Suggests a plan or schedule for including elements.

FAQs

How can I use "supposed to cover" in a sentence?

Use "supposed to cover" to indicate an expectation or requirement. For instance, "The insurance is "supposed to cover" the damages" suggests the insurance has an obligation to pay for the damages.

What's the difference between "expected to cover" and "supposed to cover"?

"Supposed to cover" implies a pre-existing agreement or plan, while "expected to cover" simply indicates an anticipation or belief about what will happen. The former suggests a firmer basis for the expectation.

What are some alternatives to "supposed to cover"?

Alternatives include "meant to include", "intended to encompass", or "designed to handle", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "supposed to cover"?

It's appropriate when discussing plans, duties, or expectations that have already been established. For example, "The meeting is "supposed to cover" the budget allocation" indicates that the budget allocation is on the agenda.