meant to include

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "meant to include" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something is intended to be part of a larger group or category. Example: "The guidelines are meant to include all team members, regardless of their role."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

This wasn't something his afternoon's schedule was meant to include.

The Guardian - Books

Another person said the $1 billion offer was not meant to include the F.H.F.A. case.

The New York Times

The new law was also meant to include rape victims who are suicidal.

The Guardian

In 2009 I meant to include it on a best-of-the-year art-book list.

The New York Times - Arts

He thought that I had forgotten — ha! Actually, I'd meant to include that in the post.

The New York Times

Surely you meant to include David Guterson in this list, though?

The Guardian - Books

"It was meant to include all workaholics," said Rendell, who is married with a grown son.

The New York Times

Diplomats and United Nations officials here agreed that Mr. Annan meant to include the General Assembly session.

The New York Times

John Speed's earlier maps had covered Scotland and Ireland, but Ogilby's Britannia never meant to include them.

The Guardian - Books

Although the word dukkha in common parlance means suffering, its use by the Buddha was meant to include both pleasure and pain, both happiness and suffering.

Encyclopedia Britannica

It was declared a new holiday, Heritage Day, under Nelson Mandela's government in a compromise meant to include all South Africa's diverse cultures, rather than just one tribe.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "meant to include" when specifying that something should be considered as part of a larger group or category. This phrasing clarifies intention and scope.

Common error

Be specific about what "meant to include" refers to. Avoid vagueness by clearly defining the elements or items intended for inclusion to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "meant to include" functions as a verbal phrase indicating intention or design regarding the inclusion of something within a larger group or category. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's grammatically correct and widely applicable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

27%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Huffington Post

7%

Formal & Business

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "meant to include" is a grammatically correct and widely used verbal phrase for specifying intentions regarding inclusion. According to Ludwig AI, it is applicable in various contexts, the phrase functions to clarify scope and ensure understanding across different domains. While its register is generally neutral, it can become more formal in academic or business settings. Pay attention to use it accurately, because, ambiguity can arise if the included elements are not clearly defined. Alternatives such as "intended to encompass" or "designed to incorporate" can be useful depending on the specific context. As seen from the usage pattern, it's a common term in News & Media and Science.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

intended to encompass

Focuses on the scope of the inclusion.

designed to incorporate

Highlights the deliberate design for inclusion.

supposed to cover

Implies an expectation or requirement of inclusion.

aimed to integrate

Emphasizes the act of bringing different parts together.

purported to involve

Suggests a claim or assertion of inclusion.

understood to comprise

Indicates a tacit agreement or understanding of inclusion.

construed to contain

Focuses on the interpretation that something is included.

envisioned to add

Stresses the planning or vision behind the inclusion.

planned to build in

Highlights a pre-arranged inclusion.

set to absorb

Suggests incorporation by assimilation.

FAQs

How can I use "meant to include" in a sentence?

You can use "meant to include" to indicate that something should be considered a part of a larger whole, for example: "The policy is meant to include all employees, regardless of their position."

What are some alternatives to "meant to include"?

Alternatives include "intended to encompass", "designed to incorporate", or "supposed to cover", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it ever incorrect to use "meant to include"?

While generally correct, ensure that the context supports the intentional aspect of the phrase. If something inherently or logically belongs without intention, a different phrasing might be more appropriate.

What's the difference between "meant to include" and "had to include"?

"Meant to include" implies intention or design, while "had to include" suggests obligation or necessity. Choose the phrase that accurately reflects the reason for inclusion.