sufficient to justify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "sufficient to justify" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing whether something meets the necessary criteria or standards to warrant a particular action or decision. Example: "The evidence presented was sufficient to justify the decision made by the committee."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The court also ruled -- unanimously -- that an anonymous tip that a person was carrying a gun was not, by itself, sufficient to justify a stop-and-frisk search.

The New York Times

But headquarters officials did not believe the French report was sufficient to justify a search warrant.

The New York Times

But will the energy, water and financial savings be sufficient to justify the cost for consumers?

The Guardian

Either inference, it insists, is sufficient to justify the termination of his employment.

Cornell University

By itself, this isn't sufficient to justify allowing the dreamers to stay.

The Washington Post

But that alone would not be sufficient to justify a lethal response from troops.

The Washington Post

Is it sufficient to justify the upheavals involved in setting up regional assemblies?

The Economist

Even the little that has survived is sufficient to justify his reputation.

Encyclopedia Britannica

and that this compliance is sufficient to justify not launching airstrikes at this time.

The Washington Post

Under court precedents, the existence of discrimination in a general sense is not sufficient to justify an affirmative action program.

The New York Times

But, Mr. Roth added, the optimism did not seem sufficient to justify the big first-day run-up.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sufficient to justify", ensure that the evidence or reasoning you present genuinely supports the conclusion or action you are advocating. Avoid overstating the case or relying on weak or irrelevant information.

Common error

A common mistake is to use "sufficient to justify" when the evidence is weak or the reasoning is flawed. Be sure that there is a robust logical connection between the evidence and the action or decision being justified. Otherwise, readers may perceive your argument as unconvincing or misleading.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sufficient to justify" primarily functions as a connector indicating a cause-and-effect relationship or a rationale. It links a condition, evidence, or reason to a subsequent action or decision, asserting that the former adequately supports or warrants the latter. Ludwig AI confirms its proper and usable state.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Academia

34%

Science

25%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "sufficient to justify" is a common and grammatically sound construction used to indicate that something meets the necessary criteria to warrant a particular action or decision. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability. It is most frequently found in news media, academic writing, and scientific publications. While there are no inherent grammatical errors, it is crucial to ensure that the evidence presented genuinely supports the action or decision being justified and to avoid overstating the case. Alternatives such as ""adequate to warrant"" or ""enough to necessitate"" may be used depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Adequate to warrant

Replaces "sufficient" with "adequate" and "justify" with "warrant", focusing on the idea of being enough to permit something.

Enough to necessitate

Substitutes "justify" with "necessitate", emphasizing that something is compelling or unavoidable because of the justification.

Warrants the action of

Reformulates the phrase to highlight that something serves as a good reason for taking a specific course of action.

Provides justification for

Changes the structure to focus on the provision of a rationale.

Substantiates the need for

Emphasizes that there is solid, demonstrable support for requiring something.

Justifies the means of

Highlights the "means" and underscores what is being used to achieve a specific end.

Forms a valid basis for

Highlights the "basis" or bedrock of the argument or action.

Is a legitimate reason for

Simple phrasing that emphasizes legitimacy as the key element.

Is grounds for

A concise alternative that indicates sufficient cause.

Legitimizes the choice of

Focuses on acceptance or authorization of a specific selection or decision.

FAQs

How can I use "sufficient to justify" in a sentence?

Use "sufficient to justify" to indicate that something meets the necessary criteria or standards to warrant a particular action or decision. For example, "The evidence was "sufficient to justify" further investigation".

What are some alternatives to "sufficient to justify"?

Alternatives include "adequate to warrant", "enough to necessitate", or "provides justification for", depending on the context.

Is it better to use "sufficient to justify" or "enough to justify"?

While both are grammatically correct, "sufficient to justify" is generally considered more formal and precise than "enough to justify". The choice depends on the tone and audience of your writing.

What's the difference between "sufficient to justify" and "necessary to justify"?

"Sufficient to justify" means something is adequate or enough to warrant an action. "Necessary to justify" implies something is essential or required to make an action justifiable. The former focuses on adequacy, while the latter emphasizes requirement.