sufficient evidence

USAGE SUMMARY

"sufficient evidence" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You could use it in a sentence like, "The prosecutor presented sufficient evidence to secure a conviction."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Others had seen sufficient evidence.

The New York Times

402 (independently sufficient evidence).

Cornell University

"There is sufficient evidence from international observers.

The New York Times

These conclusions are supported by sufficient evidence.

Stanford University

Isn't that sufficient evidence of his commitment?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

The post-1929 examprovidesidesufficientnt evidence of that.

The Guardian - Opinion

For lack of sufficient evidence, however, he was never prosecuted.

The New York Times - Science

"Without sufficient evidence, there are certain steps we can't take.

The New York Times

However, sufficient evidence was gathered to complete the inspection".

The Guardian

Also there is not sufficient evidence," Mo said.

The Guardian

But there is sufficient evidence to confirm his identity.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "sufficient evidence", ensure that the evidence is directly relevant to the claim or argument you are making. Avoid including extraneous details that do not contribute to the overall strength of the evidence.

Common error

A common mistake is to assume that correlation implies causation when presenting "sufficient evidence". Ensure that the evidence demonstrates a clear causal link rather than just a correlation between variables.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "sufficient evidence" functions as a noun phrase that typically serves as the subject or object of a verb. It denotes the presence of adequate proof or justification to support a claim, argument, or decision. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is both correct and widely used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

15%

Encyclopedias

3%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "sufficient evidence" is a widely used and grammatically correct phrase that signifies the presence of adequate proof to support a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's frequently encountered in news, academic, and legal contexts, serving to persuade, inform, or justify decisions. While generally neutral to formal, it's best suited for professional environments, as shown in the Ludwig examples. Remember to ensure that the evidence is directly relevant and demonstrates clear causation, avoiding logical fallacies.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

adequate proof

Replaces "evidence" with "proof" and "sufficient" with "adequate", maintaining a similar level of formality.

ample justification

Substitutes "evidence" with "justification" and "sufficient" with "ample", suggesting a more reason-based support.

enough proof

Uses "enough" instead of "sufficient", making it slightly less formal.

convincing evidence

Emphasizes the persuasive quality of the evidence.

compelling evidence

Highlights the strength and irrefutability of the evidence.

considerable proof

Implies a large quantity of proof.

substantial proof

Indicates that the evidence is weighty and important.

reasonable grounds

Shifts the focus from direct evidence to the basis for a belief or action.

a preponderance of the evidence

This is a legal term, meaning the greater weight of the evidence.

the required evidence

Focuses on evidence that meets a specific standard or requirement.

FAQs

How can I use "sufficient evidence" in a sentence?

You can use "sufficient evidence" to indicate that there is enough proof to support a claim, for example, "The prosecution presented "sufficient evidence" to convict the defendant".

What are some alternatives to "sufficient evidence"?

Alternatives include "adequate proof", "ample justification", or "convincing evidence", which you can use depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "sufficient evidence" or "enough evidence"?

"Sufficient evidence" is generally considered more formal than "enough evidence". The choice depends on the context and the desired level of formality. "Sufficient" implies meeting a specific requirement or standard.

What does it mean to say that there is a "lack of sufficient evidence"?

A "lack of sufficient evidence" means that there is not enough proof or justification to support a claim or take a particular action. It suggests that the available evidence does not meet the required threshold for certainty or conviction.