adequate proof

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "adequate proof" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the sufficiency or acceptability of evidence in various contexts, such as legal, scientific, or academic discussions. Example: "The court required adequate proof of the defendant's guilt before reaching a verdict."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

32 human-written examples

Last week, the younger Mr. Sirica said that Ms. Adler had not presented adequate proof.

The New York Times

The decision to place Sudan on a list of states that harbor terrorists without what he considers adequate proof.

The New York Times

The ASA concluded that the ad can only be shown again if adequate proof is included to bear out the pendant's alleged powers.

The Guardian

Judge Sauls has been repeatedly reversed for taking too narrow an approach with admitting evidence and for punishing defendants too harshly by misinterpreting statutes and sustaining convictions without adequate proof.

The New York Times

The court, the Court of First Instance in Luxembourg, said in a ruling released on Wednesday that the commission had failed to show adequate proof that Volkswagen had committed antitrust behavior.

The New York Times

Defense lawyers said the prosecution had failed to provide adequate proof of their clients' wrongdoing and called the evidence "too unreliable and too scanty when it comes to key issues".

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

27 human-written examples

Although AMPs have only been tested in a small number of clinical trials, there is adequate proof-of-concept to support their use as topical anti-infectives.

Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology

In November 2007, United States District Judge Charles R. Breyer, in San Francisco, ruled that the plaintiffs had not offered adequate scientific proof that the 200-milligram dose of Celebrex — the most commonly prescribed dose — had caused heart attacks and strokes.

The New York Times

Preferably, performance indicators are based on recommendations with adequate scientific proof of their effectiveness, safety and efficiency [ 16].

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Nevertheless, there must be a basis of recommendations with adequate scientific proof of their evidence, safety and feasibility to develop performance indicators [ 16], particularly because the introduction of performance indicators may have a large impact on clinical practice.

European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases

Our hypothesis was that there would be wide ranges in sponsorship (industry or not), type(s) of intervention(s), use of DSMBs, presence of interim analyses and early stopping rules, absolute risk increase (ARI), and whether or not adequate prior proof-of-principle Phase II studies were done of RCTs that found increased mortality rates of the intervention compared to control groups.

Annals of Intensive Care

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "adequate proof", ensure your evidence is directly relevant to the claim and clearly demonstrates the point you are trying to make. Avoid ambiguity and ensure all sources are properly cited to enhance credibility.

Common error

Be cautious of presenting evidence as "adequate proof" when it only partially supports your claim. Overstating the strength of evidence can weaken your argument and undermine your credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequate proof" functions as a noun phrase, where "adequate" modifies the noun "proof". It describes a level of evidence or justification that is sufficient or acceptable for a specific purpose. Ludwig AI indicates it's correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

36%

Science

40%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

4%

Science

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "adequate proof" is a commonly used and grammatically correct term indicating a sufficient level of evidence to support a claim. As Ludwig AI confirms, it fits seamlessly into various writing contexts. Found frequently in News & Media and Science, it maintains a neutral to formal tone. For persuasive and credible writing, ensure the evidence presented as "adequate proof" is relevant, sufficient, and clearly presented. While related phrases like "sufficient evidence" or "satisfactory evidence" can be alternatives, the core message of demonstrating acceptability remains consistent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficient evidence

Replaces "proof" with "evidence", focusing on the body of facts supporting a claim.

satisfactory evidence

Substitutes "adequate" with "satisfactory", implying the evidence meets a required standard.

ample demonstration

Replaces "proof" with "demonstration", and "adequate" with "ample" which suggests a clear and convincing display.

sufficient validation

Uses "validation" instead of "proof", emphasizing the act of confirming or substantiating something.

convincing substantiation

Employs "substantiation" and "convincing", to highlight that evidence offered is strong and persuasive.

appropriate justification

Replaces "proof" with "justification", which suggests the evidence defends or supports a claim.

suitable confirmation

Uses "confirmation" rather than "proof", which implies that provided evidence is a verification for a certain statement.

proper verification

Replaces "proof" with "verification", emphasizing the act of checking or proving the truth.

valid substantiation

Uses "substantiation" instead of "proof", focusing on establishing something with evidence.

cogent demonstration

Employs "demonstration" and "cogent", emphasizing that evidence offered is clear, logical and convincing.

FAQs

What are some synonyms for "adequate proof"?

Alternatives for "adequate proof" include "sufficient evidence", "satisfactory evidence", or "ample demonstration", depending on the specific context.

How do I determine if I have "adequate proof"?

To determine if you have "adequate proof", assess whether the evidence you possess is both relevant and sufficient to support your claim, meeting the required standards of the situation (e.g., legal, scientific).

What happens if I don't have "adequate proof"?

Without "adequate proof", your claim may not be accepted or believed. This can lead to negative outcomes, such as losing a legal case, failing to publish a scientific paper, or damaging your reputation.

How is "adequate proof" different from "circumstantial evidence"?

"Adequate proof" refers to evidence that directly supports a claim, whereas circumstantial evidence indirectly suggests a fact. While circumstantial evidence can contribute to building a case, it must meet established standards of proof to be considered "adequate proof".