succeeded by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "succeeded by" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that one person or thing follows another in a sequence, often in contexts such as leadership or succession. Example: "The CEO was succeeded by her deputy after her retirement."

✓ Grammatically correct

Encyclopedias

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was succeeded by Grey.

Encyclopedia Britannica

(He was succeeded by Dominique Strauss-Kahn).

The New Yorker

He was succeeded by Fukuda Yasuo.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The flowers are succeeded by red berries.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was succeeded by Millard Fillmore.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He is succeeded by Kgalema Motlanthe.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Birendra was succeeded by his brother, Gyanendra.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Phone threats were succeeded by physical threats.

The New Yorker

(The studio succeeded by a smidge).

The New York Times

But neither was succeeded by an equal.

The Economist

In 1995 he was succeeded by Neal Kozodoy.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about transitions in leadership or historical events, use "succeeded by" to clearly indicate the person or event that came next. This is especially useful when establishing a timeline or explaining a lineage.

Common error

Avoid using "succeeded by" when you mean "preceded by". "Succeeded by" means 'followed by', while "preceded by" means 'came before'. Double-check your wording to ensure you're conveying the correct order.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "succeeded by" functions as a passive verb construction indicating sequential order or replacement. It typically links a subject to its successor, denoting that the latter follows the former in a specific role, position, or sequence of events. This is validated by Ludwig examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Encyclopedias

26%

News & Media

40%

Wiki

21%

Less common in

Science

9%

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "succeeded by" is a versatile and commonly used construction to denote sequential order, often indicating a replacement in roles or events. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity and widespread use. The phrase's grammatical function is a passive verb construction. It typically adopts a neutral to formal register, making it suitable for news reporting, encyclopedic entries, and general writing where a clear sequence is to be established. The most frequent contexts where the term appears are in Encyclopedias, News & Media and Wiki, as well as in Science. Using "succeeded by" correctly involves ensuring that it aligns with chronological order and distinguishing it from similar-sounding phrases like "preceded by" to maintain accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

Replaced by

Focuses more on the act of substitution, less on the sequential aspect.

Followed by

Emphasizes the sequence of events, without necessarily implying a direct replacement.

Took over from

Implies assuming control or responsibility from someone.

Succeeded to

More formal, often used in the context of inheriting a title or position.

Came after

A simple and direct way to indicate sequence.

Was the successor of

More formal and passive way of expressing succession.

Inherited by

Specifically denotes inheritance, often of a title or estate.

Assumed by

Highlights the act of taking on a role or responsibility.

Took the place of

Emphasizes that the position was refilled.

Ensuing

Describes what follows something else but does not necessarily indicate direct replacement.

FAQs

How do I use "succeeded by" in a sentence?

Use "succeeded by" to indicate that someone or something followed another in a position or sequence. For example, "The CEO was "succeeded by" her deputy.".

What can I say instead of "succeeded by"?

You can use alternatives like "replaced by", "followed by", or "took over from" depending on the specific context.

Which is correct, "succeeded by" or "was succeeded by"?

"Succeeded by" is a more concise form, while "was "succeeded by"" adds emphasis to the passive voice, highlighting the action done to the subject. Both are grammatically correct.

What is the difference between "succeeded by" and "superseded by"?

"Succeeded by" indicates a chronological order of events or individuals, while "superseded by" suggests that something has been replaced because it is outdated or obsolete.