replaced by

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "replaced by" is correct and usable in written English.
Generally, it is used to indicate that one thing is substituting another, or taking its place. For example, "The old boardwalk was replaced by a new path."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Intimacy replaced by expedience.

The New York Times

Replaced by Algirdas Brazauskas.

BBC

Eventually replaced by Pavlyuchenko.

Independent

"Shall" was replaced by "should".

Independent

Nani is replaced by Rolando.

The New York Times

Shuttle vans replaced by speedboats.

The New York Times

Andom was replaced by Brig.

Encyclopedia Britannica

To be replaced by whom?

The Economist

Planning is replaced by chaos.

Independent

Replaced by flip flops.

The Guardian - Music

He's replaced by Ramires.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "replaced by", ensure that the context clearly identifies both the original element and its replacement to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "replaced by" without specifying what is doing the replacing. For example, instead of saying "The old system was replaced by something new", be specific: "The old system was "replaced by" a cloud-based solution."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "replaced by" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, indicating that one thing has taken the place of another. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Encyclopedias

20%

Science

15%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Social Media

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "replaced by" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed prepositional phrase indicating substitution or succession. Ludwig AI validates its usage across various contexts, ranging from news and media to encyclopedias and scientific publications. Predominantly neutral in register, it functions to denote that one thing has taken the place of another, ensuring clarity and precision in writing. By adhering to best practices and avoiding common errors, writers can effectively utilize "replaced by" to enhance their communication. The related phrases and examples provided offer additional insights into its nuanced application.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

substituted with

Emphasizes the act of exchanging one thing for another, often highlighting the new element's properties.

supplanted by

Suggests a more forceful or complete replacement, implying the old element is no longer present or relevant.

taken over by

Implies control or dominance of the new element over the previous one.

succeeded by

Focuses on the sequential aspect, indicating a transition from one state or entity to the next.

displaced by

Highlights the removal or ousting of the original element by the new one.

yielded to

Suggests the original element gave way or succumbed to the new one, often due to pressure or inability to resist.

exchanged for

Focuses on the mutual giving and receiving aspect of the replacement.

superseded by

Indicates that the new element is superior or more up-to-date than the old one.

become the new

It emphasizes that one thing has now taken up the role of another.

transitioned to

Refers to a change from one state or role to another.

FAQs

How do I use "replaced by" in a sentence?

Use "replaced by" to show that one thing has taken the place of another. For example, "The traditional textbook was "replaced by" "digital resources"".

What can I say instead of "replaced by"?

You can use alternatives like "substituted with", "supplanted by", or "taken over by" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "replaced by" or "replaced with"?

"Replaced by" is generally used when indicating what is doing the replacing (the agent), while "replaced with" emphasizes the new element itself. Both are correct but convey slightly different nuances.

What's the difference between "replaced by" and "succeeded by"?

"Replaced by" simply indicates a substitution, whereas "succeeded by" implies a sequential order or a transition of power or position.