subordinate to

USAGE SUMMARY

"subordinate to" is a perfectly valid phrase in written English.
Generally, the phrase is used to indicate that one thing is subject to or dependent upon something else. For example, "The agent had to obey any instructions given by their superior, subordinate to their own ethical standards."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

NCOs are subordinate to commissioned officers.

The New York Times

Otherwise we're all subordinate to bureaucrats.

The Economist

Capital is subordinate to that.

The Guardian

It was subordinate to the Politburo.

The Guardian

"He's become subordinate to her efforts.

The New York Times

In Western culture, color has always been subordinate to line.

The New York Times

Character, in this papacy, is subordinate to spectacle.

The New Yorker

The MCI Quips, moreover, were subordinate to other MCI debts.

The New York Times

Even misery is subordinate to the big beat.

The Guardian - Music

Currently other parties are subordinate to the Communist Party.

The New York Times

Although generally subordinate to men, certain women had signficant influence.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "subordinate to", ensure the relationship between the two entities is clear to avoid ambiguity. Be specific about what one entity is being subordinate to and why.

Common error

Avoid using "subordinate to" when the relationship is one of collaboration or equality. This phrase implies a power dynamic or hierarchical structure, so use it appropriately.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "subordinate to" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating a relationship of lower rank, importance, or power. As Ludwig AI confirms, it signifies one entity being subject to or dependent on another. Examples show it denoting hierarchy, dependency, or lesser importance.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

22%

Encyclopedias

11%

Less common in

Wiki

7%

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "subordinate to" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a relationship of lesser importance, rank, or power. As Ludwig AI points out, it's used to indicate dependence or being subject to something else. It appears most frequently in news and media, science, and encyclopedia sources, suggesting a neutral to formal register. While interchangeable alternatives exist, "inferior to", "secondary to", and "subject to" are good alternatives, it is important to use "subordinate to" when you want to highlight a hierarchy and/or a formal power dynamic. Be mindful of the implied power dynamic and ensure it accurately reflects the intended relationship. It's a correct expression.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

inferior to

This alternative emphasizes the lower quality or status compared to something else.

secondary to

This highlights that something is less important or comes after something else.

subject to

This suggests dependence or being under the control of something else.

dependent on

This indicates a reliance on something for support or existence.

answerable to

This implies accountability and the need to report to someone.

lower in rank than

This explicitly states a hierarchical position.

controlled by

This emphasizes the power dynamic and influence of one entity over another.

under the authority of

This highlights the legitimate power and command structure.

governed by

Suggests a regulated relationship.

conditional upon

Emphasizes that something is subject to certain terms or conditions.

FAQs

How to use "subordinate to" in a sentence?

Use "subordinate to" to indicate that one thing is of lesser importance or rank than another. For example, "In the military, a sergeant is "subordinate to" a lieutenant."

What can I say instead of "subordinate to"?

You can use alternatives like "inferior to", "secondary to", or "subject to" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "subordinate to" or "subservient to"?

"Subordinate to" and "subservient to" are similar, but "subservient to" often implies a greater degree of compliance or obedience than "subordinate to".

What's the difference between "subordinate to" and "dependent on"?

"Subordinate to" implies a hierarchy or ranking, while "dependent on" suggests a reliance for support or existence. They are not always interchangeable.