strong enough for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "strong enough for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the adequacy or capability of something to meet a specific requirement or withstand a certain condition. Example: "This material is strong enough for heavy-duty use in construction projects."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Encyclopedias

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Was the hull strong enough for that?

The New Yorker

I'm not strong enough for this.

The New Yorker

Our defence is strong enough for Henry.

The Guardian - Sport

He's not strong enough for that situation".

The Guardian

"Fortunately, you're strong enough for both of you.

The New Yorker

Contemporary stomachs are not strong enough for such theological carrion.

The New Yorker

They are not strong enough for 50-tonne battle tanks.

The Economist

Are you and he strong enough for such a deal?

The New York Times

This means the colony is strong enough for routine maintenance.

The New York Times

King Roger emerges from his trials strong enough for freedom.

The Guardian - Music

Well, is the economy strong enough for a rate hike?

The Guardian - Business

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing requirements, specify the exact criteria something must meet to be considered "strong enough for". For example, instead of saying "The rope is strong enough", specify "The rope is "strong enough for" lifting 200 pounds."

Common error

Avoid using "strong enough for" without specifying what the subject is being measured against. For example, saying "This computer is strong enough" is vague. Instead, specify: "This computer is "strong enough for" video editing."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "strong enough for" functions as a qualifier or descriptor, indicating that something possesses the necessary strength or capacity to meet a particular requirement or withstand a specific condition. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, this phrase is grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

30%

Academia

20%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Science

15%

Encyclopedias

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "strong enough for" is a versatile phrase used to express whether something meets the requirements for a specific purpose or task. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and common usage. It appears frequently in News & Media, Academia, and Wiki sources, with a neutral register suitable for diverse contexts. When using this phrase, be specific about what the subject needs to be strong enough for to avoid vagueness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficient for

Focuses on the adequacy of something to meet a specific requirement.

adequate for

Highlights the satisfactory nature of something in relation to a need.

capable of

Emphasizes the inherent ability to handle something.

able to handle

Stresses the ability to manage or deal with a specific task or situation.

up to the task of

Implies preparedness and competence for a particular challenge.

equal to

Suggests a matching or comparable level of strength or capability.

good enough for

Indicates a minimum acceptable level of suitability.

strong enough to

Emphasizes the capacity to perform an action.

robust enough for

Highlights the durability and resilience required.

meets the requirements of

Formally asserts compliance with specific standards.

FAQs

How can I use "strong enough for" in a sentence?

Use "strong enough for" to describe if something meets the requirements for a particular task or purpose. For example, "Is this rope "strong enough for" climbing?"

What are some alternatives to "strong enough for"?

Some alternatives include "sufficient for", "adequate for", or "capable of", depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "strong enough for me"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. It simply means that something meets your personal standards or capabilities. For example, "This coffee is "strong enough for" me."

Which is correct: "strong enough to" or "strong enough for"?

Both are correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Strong enough to" refers to the ability to perform an action, while "strong enough for" refers to suitability for a specific purpose. For example, "He is "strong enough to" lift the box", vs. "This container is "strong enough for" storing chemicals."