Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

adequate for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

'adequate for' is a perfectly acceptable phrase to use in written English.
You can use it when referring to something having enough of a quality or quantity to fulfill a specified purpose. Example: This amount of money is adequate for covering the cost of the repairs.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

It proved adequate for many years.

News & Media

The Economist

Neither, statistically, seems adequate for a review.

News & Media

Independent

It was perfectly adequate for one person.

News & Media

The New York Times

Blockbuster is adequate for new releases.

News & Media

The New York Times

Nothing else seems adequate for some reason.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Seasoning is minimal, but adequate for most palates.

News & Media

The New York Times

Sales Associate: It's perfectly adequate for freeway speeds.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Blunt knives, of course, were barely adequate for most meats.

News & Media

The New Yorker

It is quite small, not adequate for laps or exercise.

A television-quality tape is adequate for that purpose.

News & Media

The New York Times

One inch an hour is adequate for a home lawn.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "adequate for", ensure the context clearly defines what the subject is sufficient for. This avoids ambiguity and ensures your meaning is accurately conveyed.

Common error

Avoid using "adequate for" when a stronger term like "excellent" or "optimal" is more appropriate. "Adequate" implies meeting a minimum standard, not exceeding expectations.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "adequate for" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a preposition. It modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating that something is sufficient or satisfactory for a particular purpose. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is perfectly acceptable for use in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

33%

Encyclopedias

4%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "adequate for" is a common and grammatically sound expression used to indicate that something is sufficient or satisfactory for a specific purpose. According to Ludwig AI, it's perfectly acceptable in English writing. With numerous examples across diverse fields like science, news, and general discourse, it shows broad applicability. While alternatives such as "sufficient for" or "suitable for" exist, "adequate for" maintains a versatile neutrality. When using this phrase, ensure clarity regarding what the subject is "adequate for" to avoid any potential ambiguity.

FAQs

What does "adequate for" mean?

"Adequate for" means sufficient or satisfactory for a particular purpose or need. It implies that something meets the minimum requirements without necessarily being exceptional.

How can I use "adequate for" in a sentence?

You can use "adequate for" to describe something that meets the necessary requirements for a specific situation. For example, "The budget is "sufficient for" the project's initial phase".

What are some alternatives to "adequate for"?

Alternatives include "sufficient for", "suitable for", "appropriate for", or "enough for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "adequate for" and "ideal for"?

Yes. "Adequate for" implies meeting a minimum standard, while "ideal for" suggests being the best possible choice. If something is "ideal for", it not only meets the requirements but also offers additional benefits or advantages. So, "suitable for" may work as alternative but not "ideal for".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: