stood accused of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "stood accused of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to someone who is formally charged with a crime or wrongdoing. Example: "He stood accused of embezzlement after the investigation revealed discrepancies in the financial records."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Indians stood accused of selling the country short.

The Guardian - Opinion

Creating a "hostile environment" is what the Bangladeshi bloggers stood accused of.

The New Yorker

Once again, he stood accused of taking a bus or a subway car for a ride.

The New York Times

He stood accused of stealing watches worth $1.4 million from a Frankfurt jewelry store in 2003.

The New Yorker

Now it was Grannis who stood accused — of spreading scandalous reports.

The New York Times

They had multiplied under Labour, and stood accused of marginalising the revered civil service.

The Economist

His strength coach, Sal Alosi, stood accused of tripping and injuring a Miami player.

The New York Times - Sports

The families of those he stood accused of ordering murdered say they are aghast.

The New York Times

She stood accused of mailing a bomb to one of her supervisors at Harvard.

The New Yorker

He thus stood accused of denying the basis of good architecture.

Britannica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

It stands accused of supporting cigarette smuggling.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider alternatives like "was charged with" or "faced allegations of" if you want to vary your language or if the situation isn't strictly a formal legal accusation.

Common error

Avoid using "stood accused of" in very informal settings. This phrase carries a weight of formality, so using it in casual conversation or writing might sound overly dramatic or out of place.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "stood accused of" primarily functions as a verbal phrase indicating that someone has been formally charged or accused of a wrongdoing. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase is usable in written English and commonly associated with formal accusations.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

98%

Academia

1%

Wiki

1%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "stood accused of" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, particularly in news and media contexts, to indicate that someone is formally facing accusations. Ludwig AI validates its usability. While alternatives like "was charged with" or "faced allegations of" exist, this phrase emphasizes the formality of the accusation and is best suited for neutral to professional registers. Avoid using it in informal settings to maintain appropriate tone and clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

was charged with

This is a direct and common substitute, indicating a formal accusation.

faced allegations of

This phrase emphasizes the allegations themselves, rather than the formal charge.

was facing accusations of

Similar to 'faced allegations', but slightly stronger in emphasizing the accusations.

was suspected of

Implies a lack of concrete evidence, focusing on suspicion.

was indicted for

Indicates a formal indictment by a grand jury, a more specific legal term.

was on trial for

Refers to the actual legal process of a trial.

was named as a suspect in

Suggests an ongoing investigation where the person is a potential suspect.

was held accountable for

Focuses on the aspect of responsibility and being made to answer for actions.

was called out for

This is a less formal alternative, often used in less serious contexts.

was pointed out as the culprit

This is a more informal way to state the person was blamed.

FAQs

How to use "stood accused of" in a sentence?

The phrase "stood accused of" is used to indicate that someone is formally charged with a crime or wrongdoing. For example: "He "stood accused of" embezzlement after the investigation revealed discrepancies in the financial records."

What can I say instead of "stood accused of"?

You can use alternatives like "was charged with", "faced allegations of", or "was suspected of depending on the context".

Which is correct, "stood accused of" or "was accused of"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but ""stood accused of"" is often used in more formal or journalistic contexts to emphasize the gravity of the accusation. "was accused of" is more general.

What's the difference between "stood accused of" and "allegedly"?

"Stood accused of" indicates a formal charge or accusation, while "allegedly" is used to express that a claim is made but not yet proven. You might say someone ""stood accused of"" a crime that they "allegedly" committed.