Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

was suspected of

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"was suspected of" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that someone is thought to have done something wrong or illegal. For example: John was suspected of participating in a robbery, so the police put out an all-points bulletin.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The Sudanese government was suspected of complicity.

News & Media

The Economist

She was suspected of underage drinking.

He was suspected of running a black market in gasoline.

He was suspected of leaking secrets to Japanese banks.

News & Media

The New York Times

He said the cleric was suspected of "inciting hatred".

News & Media

The Guardian

Another was suspected of being a Russian agent himself.

News & Media

The New York Times

Tiberius was suspected of having ordered their deaths.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

Suddenly, every Haitian was suspected of having AIDS.

News & Media

The New Yorker

He was suspected of conspiracy and was tortured.

A Sikh separatist group was suspected of the attack.

News & Media

The New York Times

The man was suspected of identifying local protesters for arrest.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "was suspected of", provide context about what the person was suspected of doing to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "was suspected of" as a definitive statement of guilt. The phrase indicates suspicion, not confirmed wrongdoing. Always maintain a neutral tone and avoid making unsubstantiated claims.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "was suspected of" functions as a passive construction indicating that an individual or entity was the object of suspicion regarding a particular action or involvement. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase correctly indicates someone being thought of as having done something wrong or illegal. It suggests a state of being under suspicion, rather than a confirmed fact.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Academia

13%

Encyclopedias

7%

Less common in

Science

7%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "was suspected of" is a grammatically sound and frequently used passive construction to indicate that an individual or entity was under suspicion for a particular action. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it correctly conveys that someone is thought to have done something wrong or illegal without stating it as a proven fact. Predominantly found in news and media, but also common in academic and encyclopedic contexts, this phrase maintains a neutral register and serves to report on suspicions, allegations, or ongoing investigations. Remember to use this phrase to accurately express suspicion, avoiding any definitive claims of guilt.

FAQs

How do I use "was suspected of" in a sentence?

Use "was suspected of" to indicate that someone was believed to have committed an action, often illegal or unethical, but it has not been proven. For example: "He "was suspected of" fraud but never charged."

What are some alternatives to "was suspected of"?

Alternatives include "was believed to be", "was thought to be", or "came under suspicion for", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "was suspected of" in formal writing?

Yes, "was suspected of" is appropriate for formal writing, especially in news reports, legal documents, or academic papers, as long as it's used accurately and responsibly to reflect suspicion, not guilt.

What's the difference between "was suspected of" and "was accused of"?

"Was suspected of" implies a belief or hunch that someone committed an act, while "was accused of" indicates a formal charge or allegation has been made. Accusation is a more formal and direct claim than suspicion.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: