standards on

USAGE SUMMARY

"standards on" is not a complete sentence and therefore is not correct or usable as written English.
In order to use it in written English, you would have to include a subject and verb. For example, "The school raised the standards on student achievement."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

They just place efficiency standards on incandescents.

The New York Times

Health standards on the island are high.

Encyclopedia Britannica

maintain decent musical standards on a shoestring.

The New York Times - Magazine

Many standards on the bar menu are gone.

The New York Times

Banks are also improving their lending standards on their own.

The New York Times

Bankers did their bit by relaxing standards on credit.

The Economist

"You can't impose U.S. military standards on a Rs.

The New York Times

He sang standards on his four "Great American Songbook" albums.

The New York Times - Arts

Would impose air emission standards on motorized water scooters.

The New York Times

Now increasingly conservative courts impose tougher standards on shareholder claims.

The New York Times

Why is the PCC adopting double standards on homophobia?

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "standards on", ensure you include a subject and verb to form a complete, grammatically correct sentence. For example, "The committee set new standards on emissions."

Common error

Avoid using "standards on" as a standalone phrase. Always complete the sentence to convey a clear and grammatically correct message. For example, instead of just writing "Standards on safety", specify "The new regulations set higher standards on safety."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "standards on" typically functions as part of a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb. It indicates the subject or area to which the standards apply. As Ludwig AI points out, it needs a subject and verb to be grammatically complete.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Reference

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "standards on" is frequently used across various domains, particularly in News & Media and Scientific contexts, Ludwig AI indicates it is grammatically incomplete. It requires a subject and verb to form a complete sentence. To ensure clarity and grammatical correctness, it's important to use the phrase within a full sentence, specifying what sets or applies these standards. Consider alternatives like "criteria for" or "regulations regarding" depending on the specific context to improve clarity and precision. Authoritative sources like The New York Times and The Guardian commonly employ this phrase, but always within a complete sentence.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

requirements for

This alternative focuses on what is needed or demanded, emphasizing the obligatory nature of standards.

criteria for

This alternative focuses on the specific benchmarks or requirements used for evaluation, shifting the emphasis from a general standard to concrete measures.

benchmarks for

This alternative stresses specific points of reference used for comparison, highlighting the measurable aspect of standards.

regulations regarding

This alternative highlights the rules or directives related to a particular subject, emphasizing the regulatory aspect of standards.

specifications for

This alternative emphasizes detailed requirements or precise criteria, focusing on technical aspects of standards.

guidelines for

This alternative emphasizes providing direction or recommendations, softening the mandatory nature often associated with standards.

protocols for

This alternative suggests established procedures or systems, focusing on standardized processes.

norms concerning

This alternative focuses on established patterns or expectations, highlighting the customary aspect of standards.

principles guiding

This alternative highlights the fundamental rules or beliefs that influence actions, emphasizing the foundational aspect of standards.

metrics assessing

This alternative focuses on measurable values used to evaluate performance, emphasizing the quantitative nature of standards.

FAQs

How can I use "standards on" in a sentence?

To use "standards on" correctly, you need to include a subject and a verb. For example, "The government imposed strict "standards on" air quality" or "The company improved its "standards on" employee safety".

What are some alternatives to "standards on"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "criteria for", "regulations regarding", or "guidelines for" to express similar meanings.

Is it correct to say just "standards on" without a subject and verb?

No, "standards on" is not a complete sentence. It needs a subject and a verb to be grammatically correct. For instance, you should say "The new rules set "standards on" data privacy" instead of just "Standards on data privacy".

What's the difference between "standards on" and "standards for"?

"Standards on" typically refers to standards that are imposed or related to a specific subject. "Standards for", on the other hand, indicates the intended recipient or application of the standards. For example, ""standards on" emissions" versus "standards for vehicles".