source was given

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "source was given" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that a reference or origin of information has been provided. Example: "In the report, it was noted that the source was given for all statistical data presented."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

An analytic expression for radial and angular movement of plasma source was given.

Surface and Coatings Technology

The entries tend to be translations from Japanese publications; one source was given as The Adolescents' World Paper (少年世界報Shōnen Sekai) (1897, no. 1).

Princeton University

(The opera, based on a Russian version of an Italian source, was given its premiere in French in Chicago, in 1921).

The New York Times

The source was given by a single force excited on the ground surface at each station.

Earth, Planets and Space

Day of Defeat: Source was given a favorable reception upon release, receiving ratings of 80/100 and 81.25% from the review aggregation sites Metacritic and GameRankings.

Wikipedia

Table 1 summarizes the eight different sources of honey bees analyzed; each source was given a code that can be used to identify these experimental groups in later figures.

Plosone

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Chief Judge Ernest C. Torres of Federal District Court in Providence said last month that his sentencing could be swayed by how Mr. Taricani responded to a question about whether he knew the source was giving him the tape illegally.

The New York Times

Details and present performance of the gas source are given.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms

They can then continue to function until a valid data source is given to them.

Stanford University

The luminance emitted by this light source is given by the value "L".

Stanford University

An overview of the CSB programming tools and a knowledge source are given.

Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "source was given", ensure that it's clear and unambiguous who or what the source is. For example, "In the study, the source of funding was given as a grant from the National Institute of Health."

Common error

Avoid using "source was given" without specifying what the source actually is. Readers need to know the source to assess the information's credibility. Instead of saying, "The source was given", provide specifics: "According to the report from the Department of Energy..."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "source was given" functions as a passive voice construction, indicating that the origin or attribution of something has been stated or provided. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "source was given" is a grammatically correct and usable expression, though not very common, that's primarily used to indicate that the origin or attribution of something has been stated or provided. According to Ludwig AI, its usage spans scientific, news, and academic contexts, where clear attribution is important. While this phrase is acceptable, be sure to specify the source clearly to avoid ambiguity. While there might be situations were more direct alternatives could improve clarity, understanding proper usage of the expression will ensure you can communicate in a clear and proper form.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

origin was specified

Replaces 'source' with 'origin' and 'given' with 'specified', focusing on the place or cause of something.

attribution was provided

Emphasizes the act of attributing something to a particular source.

reference was cited

Highlights the act of quoting or mentioning a source in support of a statement.

the origin was indicated

Focuses on pointing out where something comes from.

the source was identified

Highlights that the origin has been determined and made known.

the provenance was detailed

Emphasizes a thorough description of the source's history and origin.

credit was given

Focuses on acknowledging the originator of something.

the authority was named

Specifies that the expert or official providing the information was identified.

the basis was revealed

Highlights the disclosure of the fundamental reason or principle.

the derivation was explained

Emphasizes the process of how something originated or was obtained.

FAQs

How can I use "source was given" in a sentence?

Use "source was given" to indicate that the origin or attribution of something has been specified. For instance, "The "original source" for the data was given in the appendix."

What are some alternatives to "source was given"?

You can use alternatives like "origin was specified", "attribution was provided", or "reference was cited" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "source was given" in academic writing?

In academic writing, it's appropriate to use "source was given" when you want to emphasize that the origin of information, data, or a claim has been clearly identified and referenced. This is crucial for maintaining academic integrity and allowing readers to verify the information. Example: "The "primary source" for this argument was given in Smith's (2005) seminal work."

What's the difference between "source was given" and "source was provided"?

"Source was given" emphasizes that the source was explicitly stated or indicated, whereas "source was provided" implies that the source was made available but not necessarily explicitly stated. The phrase "source was provided" is more general than the phrase "source was given".