should receive

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should receive" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone is expected to get or obtain something, often in a formal or instructional context. Example: "All applicants should receive a confirmation email within 48 hours of submission."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"Jews," he admonished, "should receive special attention".

The New York Times

They should receive considerable help from Collins.

The New York Times - Sports

Owners should receive a letter of notification.

The New York Times

Owners should receive letters about this campaign.

The New York Times

The Oscars should receive a similar boost.

The New York Times

Women should receive way more.

The Guardian - Opinion

Who should receive student visas?

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Who should receive the instruction?

University of California, Berkeley

"This bill should receive wide support".

The New York Times

Among these women, 276 (71%) thought they should receive therapy.

Maturitas

I think he should receive an answer.

Cornell University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should receive", ensure that the context clearly establishes who is expected to receive something and what they are expected to receive. Clarity prevents ambiguity.

Common error

The word "should" can imply a recommendation rather than a strict obligation. If a stronger degree of certainty is intended, consider using "must receive" or "are required to receive".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should receive" functions as a modal verb phrase, expressing expectation, recommendation, or obligation regarding the act of receiving. Ludwig shows examples across different domains, highlighting its versatile application.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Academia

25%

Science

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should receive" is a versatile and grammatically correct phrase used to express an expectation, recommendation, or obligation to obtain something. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is prevalent across diverse contexts, including news, academia, and scientific literature. While generally neutral to formal, writers should be mindful of the level of obligation implied by "should" and consider alternatives like "must" or "are required to" for stronger emphasis. Understanding these nuances can ensure clarity and precision in writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

are expected to receive

Highlights the expectation of receiving something, often based on established procedures or norms.

are due to receive

Indicates that something is scheduled or expected to be received at a particular time.

ought to get

Replaces "should" with "ought to", indicating a moral obligation or expectation, and "receive" with "get", which is less formal.

are eligible to receive

Focuses on meeting the requirements or qualifications for receiving something.

are slated to receive

Suggests a planned or scheduled receipt, implying a degree of certainty.

qualify to receive

Highlights the act of fulfilling necessary conditions to be granted something.

are in line to receive

Indicates that someone is next in a sequence or has met the criteria to receive something.

are entitled to

Emphasizes a legal or moral right to obtain something, shifting the focus to entitlement.

are to be given

Emphasizes the act of giving rather than receiving, creating a passive construction.

deserve to be given

Highlights the merit or worthiness of receiving something.

FAQs

How do I use "should receive" in a sentence?

Use "should receive" to indicate an expectation or recommendation for obtaining something. For example, "All applicants "should receive" a confirmation email" suggests an expected outcome.

What can I say instead of "should receive"?

You can use alternatives like "are expected to receive", "ought to get", or "are entitled to" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "should receive" and "must receive"?

"Should receive" implies a recommendation or expectation, while "must receive" indicates a requirement or obligation. "You "should receive" a bonus" suggests it's anticipated, whereas "You must receive training" indicates it's mandatory.

Which is correct: "should receive" or "should of received"?

"Should receive" is correct. "Should of received" is a common error arising from mishearing "should've received." Always use "should have received" or ""should receive"".