are entitled to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'are entitled to' is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is used to express a right to certain benefits or privileges, usually based on certain qualifications. For example: "All citizens are entitled to vote in national elections."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"People are entitled to their own judgement.

Independent

People are entitled to their mistakes".

The New Yorker

They are entitled to nothing less.

The New York Times

Others are entitled to their opinions.

The New York Times - Sports

"People are entitled to their opinion.

The New York Times - Sports

But they are entitled to respect.

The New York Times

The unions are entitled to their opinion.

The Economist

People are entitled to freedom of speech.

Independent

But we are entitled to ignore it.

Independent

You are entitled to it".

The Guardian - Opinion

They are entitled to confidentiality.

The Guardian - Opinion

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "are entitled to" to clearly state a right, benefit, or privilege that someone possesses based on law, agreement, or circumstance.

Common error

Avoid using "are entitled to" when you mean someone deserves something based on merit. "Entitled" implies a right, not necessarily a deserved reward. For example, instead of saying "They are entitled to praise", say "They deserve praise" if the praise is earned.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "are entitled to" functions as a declarative expression of rights or privileges. It asserts that a subject has a legitimate claim or legal basis to receive something. Ludwig AI, based on numerous examples, confirms its common usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

55%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Reference

4%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "are entitled to" is a phrase used to assert a right or privilege based on law, agreement, or circumstance. Ludwig AI confirms that it's grammatically correct and widely used, primarily in neutral to formal contexts like news, science, and business. When writing, remember that "entitled" implies a right, not simply something deserved. Related phrases include "have a right to" and "are eligible for", each with subtle differences. Use "are entitled to" to clearly communicate rights and claims.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have a right to

Focuses on the legal or moral right to something.

are eligible for

Indicates meeting the requirements for a benefit or service.

are authorized to

Emphasizes the official permission granted to do something.

are permitted to

Highlights the allowance or consent given for a particular action.

are allowed to

Suggests tolerance or lack of prohibition.

have a claim to

Indicates a legitimate basis for demanding something.

are justified in

Implies a moral or logical basis for an action or belief.

can legitimately expect

Focuses on the fairness and reasonableness of an expectation.

are warranted to

Highlights the justifiability based on circumstances.

have the privilege of

Suggests a special right or advantage granted to someone.

FAQs

How can I use "are entitled to" in a sentence?

Use "are entitled to" to indicate a right, benefit, or privilege that someone possesses. For example, "Citizens "are entitled to vote"" or "Employees "are entitled to benefits"".

What are some alternatives to "are entitled to"?

Alternatives include "have a right to", "are eligible for", or "are permitted to", depending on the specific context and the nuance you wish to convey.

Is there a difference between "are entitled to" and "deserve"?

"Are entitled to" implies a legal or moral right, while "deserve" suggests that something is earned or merited. You "are entitled to something" based on rules or agreements, whereas you deserve something based on your actions or qualities.

When is it appropriate to use "are entitled to" versus "should receive"?

Use "are entitled to" when referring to a right or legal claim. Use "should receive" when expressing an opinion about what someone ought to get, based on fairness or other non-legal considerations. "Are entitled to compensation" means they have a legal claim; should receive compensation implies it is morally right but not necessarily legally mandated.