should be rebuffed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be rebuffed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when suggesting that a certain action or proposal should be rejected or dismissed. Example: "Any attempts to undermine our authority should be rebuffed immediately."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

5 human-written examples

For the sake of credible elections, the House gambit should be rebuffed.

The New York Times

Anything less than prompt free and fair elections organized by a national unity government should be rebuffed.

The New York Times

Everyone has a pretty firm idea about what deserves to qualify and what should be rebuffed at all costs.

The Guardian

Although this is just one opinion, it is a growing trend and one that should be rebuffed by supporters of Football League clubs.

The Guardian - Sport

"Attempts of this sort to mislead and inflame voters should not be part of our political discourse and should be rebuffed by all who believe in our democracy," the leaders said.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

After Mr. Letterman made public his decision to stay at CBS on Monday, Mr. Koppel and his top producers issued a statement demanding a substantial commitment to "Nightline" and implying dire consequences for ABC and Disney should they be rebuffed.

The New York Times

Nonetheless, expect to be rebuffed.

Science Magazine

During the talks, Mr. Jalili held a 90-minute session with Ms. Ashton in which he argued that since Iran was cooperating with the International Atomic Energy Agency, sanctions should be lifted, but he was rebuffed, another European diplomat said.

The New York Times

Any suggestion that journalism shouldn't work that way was rebuffed with assertions that people in America and Europe had less at stake.

The New Yorker

But all of his diplomatic overtures were rebuffed, and it should now be clear to the world that Tehran has no intention of changing its reckless course in the absence of strong and sustained pressure from the international community.

The New York Times

PREPARE FOR REJECTION You should have a back-up plan in case your request is rebuffed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "should be rebuffed" when you want to convey a sense of necessary rejection, especially in formal or professional contexts. Ensure the subject clearly deserves a firm dismissal.

Common error

Avoid using "should be rebuffed" in casual conversations or informal writing. The formality of the phrase can sound overly stilted or pretentious in everyday settings. Opt for simpler alternatives like "should be turned down" or "should be rejected" in less formal contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be rebuffed" functions as a passive construction indicating that an action or proposal warrants rejection. As Ludwig AI confirms, it implies a necessity for something to be firmly dismissed. Examples show it used in contexts concerning elections, political discourse, and attempts to mislead.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "should be rebuffed" is a formal expression used to convey a strong recommendation that something ought to be rejected. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in suggesting the dismissal of certain actions or proposals. Predominantly found in news and media contexts, it maintains a neutral and informative tone. While grammatically sound, "should be rebuffed" is relatively rare, making it suitable for scenarios demanding a firm and decisive rejection expressed with a degree of formality. Alternatives such as "ought to be rejected" or "should be turned down" may be more appropriate in less formal settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be rejected

Replaces "should" with "ought to", maintaining a similar level of obligation but with a slightly more formal tone.

should be turned down

Uses a more informal phrasal verb ("turn down") to convey rejection, making it less formal than "rebuffed".

should be dismissed

Emphasizes the act of disregarding or ignoring the proposal, offering a slightly different focus.

must be resisted

Replaces "should" with "must", strengthening the sense of obligation and active opposition.

should be declined

A more polite and formal way of saying "rejected", often used in business or diplomatic contexts.

should be refused

Directly states that something should not be accepted, maintaining a similar level of formality.

needs to be rejected

Shifts the focus to necessity, indicating that rejection is essential or required.

should be opposed

Highlights the act of actively fighting against something, emphasizing resistance.

should be shunned

Suggests avoiding or ignoring something, adding a sense of social disapproval or moral objection.

should be prevented

Focuses on stopping something from happening, emphasizing proactive measures.

FAQs

How can I use "should be rebuffed" in a sentence?

The phrase "should be rebuffed" is used to indicate that a particular suggestion, proposal, or action ought to be rejected. For example, "Any attempts to undermine our authority "should be rebuffed" immediately".

What are some alternatives to "should be rebuffed"?

You can use alternatives like "ought to be rejected", "should be turned down", or "should be dismissed" depending on the context and desired level of formality.

Is "should be rebuffed" too formal for everyday conversation?

Yes, "should be rebuffed" tends to be quite formal. In everyday conversation, alternatives such as "should be rejected" or "should be refused" are more appropriate.

What is the difference between "should be rebuffed" and "should be rejected"?

While both phrases convey a similar meaning, "should be rebuffed" carries a slightly stronger and more formal tone. "Should be rejected" is a more general and versatile option applicable in a wider range of contexts, while "should be rebuffed" is best reserved for situations where a firm and decisive rejection is warranted.