should be dismissed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "should be dismissed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when suggesting that something is not valid, relevant, or worthy of consideration. Example: "The argument presented lacks evidence and should be dismissed as unfounded."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The government's move for dismissal, she said, "should be dismissed".

The New York Times

She suggested those complaints should be dismissed.

The New York Times

I think that the bill should be dismissed without prejudice.

Cornell University

None of this can or should be dismissed.

The New York Times

But that does not mean they should be dismissed lightly.

Independent

Likewise, if he is innocent, the case should be dismissed.

The New York Times

No clean renewable energy options should be dismissed yet.

The New York Times

But that doesn't mean the region should be dismissed.

The Guardian - Travel

And it said incompetent teachers should be dismissed more quickly.

The New York Times

They also said the suit should be dismissed.

The Guardian

This is not a payoff that should be dismissed lightly.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "should be dismissed" in formal writing, ensure that the reason for dismissal is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. For instance, specify why a claim, argument, or case "should be dismissed".

Common error

Avoid using "should be dismissed" excessively in informal conversations. While grammatically correct, it can sound overly formal or dismissive. Consider more casual alternatives like "let's drop it" or "forget about it" in less formal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "should be dismissed" functions as a passive voice construction, typically used to express a recommendation, judgment, or conclusion that something lacks merit or validity. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and widespread usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Academia

32%

Science

9%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "should be dismissed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase that serves to advocate the rejection or invalidation of something. Ludwig AI analysis and examples indicate its prevalence in formal contexts like news reports, academic papers, and legal documents. While versatile, it's important to consider the formality of the setting, opting for more casual alternatives in informal conversations. By understanding its communicative purpose and register, writers can effectively use "should be dismissed" to convey a clear judgment or recommendation.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

ought to be rejected

Replaces "should" with "ought to", conveying a stronger sense of obligation or advisability.

needs to be rejected

Indicates a stronger need for rejection than simply dismissing something.

needs to be disregarded

Focuses on ignoring or paying no attention to something due to its irrelevance or inaccuracy.

ought to be disregarded

Similar to "needs to be disregarded" but uses "ought to" for a slightly stronger suggestion.

must be invalidated

Emphasizes the act of formally declaring something as not valid or legitimate.

should not be considered

Suggests that something is not worthy of being taken into account or given attention.

should be disregarded entirely

Adds emphasis to the act of disregarding something completely.

must be set aside

Implies formally rejecting something, particularly in a legal or formal context.

warrants no further attention

Indicates that something is not deserving of any more consideration or focus.

does not merit consideration

Suggests that something lacks the qualities necessary to be worthy of consideration.

FAQs

How can I use "should be dismissed" in a sentence?

The phrase "should be dismissed" is used to express that something is not worthy of consideration or is invalid. For example, "The lawsuit "should be dismissed" due to lack of evidence".

What are some alternatives to "should be dismissed"?

Alternatives include phrases like "ought to be rejected", "needs to be disregarded", or "must be invalidated", depending on the context.

In what contexts is "should be dismissed" most appropriate?

This phrase is suitable for formal contexts, such as legal documents, academic papers, or professional reports, where a clear and authoritative tone is required.

What's the difference between "should be dismissed" and "could be dismissed"?

"Should be dismissed" implies a stronger recommendation or justification for dismissal, while "could be dismissed" suggests a possibility or option but not necessarily a strong endorsement.