set aside with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "set aside with" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey the idea of reserving or allocating something, but it does not form a coherent expression. Example: "The funds were set aside with the intention of supporting local charities."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

26 human-written examples

Dice segments and set aside with juice.

The New York Times

We have two fields set aside with big screens and various smaller screens throughout the festival".

The Guardian - Music

Squeeze over a little lemon juice and set aside with the diced cucumber.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Dealing with longer, more difficult crises gets set aside, with only rhetoric to salve them.

The Guardian

By 1989 he was working again for Mr. Wolfowitz, this time at the Pentagon, and the novel was set aside with few regrets.

The New York Times

Money the players set aside with the union in case of a work stoppage will be paid back, an amount estimated at roughly $10,000 per month per player.

The New York Times - Sports

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

31 human-written examples

Additionally, electoral officials had been setting aside, with little explanation, vote summaries from Kinshasa, a bastion of support for Mr. Tshisekedi; that practice appeared to have slowed after international observers vigorously protested.

The New York Times

Set aside pan with oil in it.

The New York Times

Set aside, covered with a clean tea towel for a good hour.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Our poll found 34% of conservatives disapproving of the $20 billion set aside, compared with 10% of moderates and 3% of liberals.

Forbes

The predictive accuracy of this classifier is determined using the test (set aside) examples with the same set of features.

Bioinformatics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "set aside with", opt for clearer and more grammatically sound alternatives such as "reserved for", "allocated to", or "designated for" to improve clarity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "set aside with" in an attempt to sound formal. Simpler phrases like "reserved for" are often more effective and less likely to confuse your reader.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "set aside with" functions as a verb phrase attempting to describe the act of reserving or allocating something for a particular purpose or association. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, this construction is not considered standard English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Science

28%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "set aside with" appears in a variety of sources, including news and media outlets, it's not considered grammatically correct in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment. It's better to use clearer and more accepted alternatives such as ""reserved for"", ""allocated to"", or ""designated for"" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy. Avoiding "set aside with" will improve the overall quality and professionalism of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

set apart for

This alternative specifies a purpose or recipient for what is being reserved.

reserved for

This option clearly indicates that something is being kept for a specific use or person.

allocated to

This suggests a formal distribution of resources to a particular area or group.

designated for

Similar to 'allocated to', but implies a more official or predetermined assignment.

earmarked for

This option indicates that funds or resources are specifically intended for a certain purpose.

put aside for

This is a more informal way of saying something is being saved or reserved.

saved for

This term clearly communicates that something is being preserved for future use.

kept for

This expression directly states that something is being retained for a specific reason.

set to one side for

This version explicitly indicates something is being moved away and reserved.

assigned to

This term suggests a more formal or structured allocation of something.

FAQs

How can I use the phrase "set aside with" correctly?

While "set aside with" isn't standard English, you can rephrase your sentence using alternatives like "reserved for", "allocated to", or "designated for" depending on the context.

What's a more formal way to say "set aside with"?

For a more formal tone, replace "set aside with" with "allocated to" or "designated for". These alternatives imply a structured and official assignment.

What are some common mistakes when using "set aside with"?

A common mistake is using "set aside with" instead of clearer alternatives like "reserved for" or "put aside for". These alternatives are more common and grammatically correct.

Is "set aside with" grammatically correct?

No, "set aside with" is not considered grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use alternatives like "set apart for" or "reserved for" to ensure clarity and correctness.