Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
scientifically sound
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "scientifically sound" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to a set of facts, measurements, or theories that have been supported or validated by scientific study or analysis. For example, you might write, "The research results were scientifically sound, providing reliable evidence to support the hypothesis."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The math is scientifically sound.
News & Media
Why Darwinism is scientifically sound, or not.
News & Media
The missile shield is not scientifically sound.
News & Media
It turns out that this is scientifically sound advice.
News & Media
This approach is straightforward, efficient, accountable and scientifically sound.
News & Media
The E.P.A. responded that its actions were legally and scientifically sound.
News & Media
"We're just trying to conduct unbiased, scientifically sound research," he added.
News & Media
"We consider the tests neither well thought out nor scientifically sound," he said.
News & Media
Pliny's observations were not scientifically sound — not even close — but I understand how he arrived there.
News & Media
It is important that we understand the recovery process on a scientifically sound basis".
News & Media
Protecting the nation's remaining roadless lands is a scientifically sound, popular and politically pragmatic policy.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "scientifically sound", ensure that the statement or claim it modifies has clear links to empirical data, peer-reviewed studies, or established scientific theories.
Common error
Avoid using "scientifically sound" to describe preliminary results or hypotheses that have not yet undergone rigorous testing or peer review. Prematurely labeling something as "scientifically sound" can mislead readers.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "scientifically sound" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun, indicating that something is based on or conforms to the principles and methods of science. Ludwig shows that it is commonly used to describe research, methods, or conclusions.
Frequent in
Science
53%
News & Media
43%
Formal & Business
4%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "scientifically sound" is a grammatically correct and frequently used adjective phrase that indicates something is based on reliable scientific methods and principles. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and provides numerous real-world examples. It is most commonly found in scientific and news contexts, conveying credibility and reliability. When employing this phrase, ensure there are clear links to empirical data or established scientific theories. While highly valuable in professional and academic writing, remember that the phrase may be too formal for some everyday contexts.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
scientifically validated
Highlights that scientific methods were used to confirm its accuracy.
evidence-based
Focuses on the backing by empirical data, which is a component of being scientifically sound.
research-backed
Highlights the support from research, which is often needed to claim something as scientifically sound.
validated by research
Emphasizes the confirmation through investigation, a component to be scientifically sound.
empirically supported
Stresses the role of experimental evidence in supporting a claim.
rigorously tested
Highlights the thoroughness of the testing process, implying reliability.
based on solid evidence
Focuses more on evidence as the foundation of a claim.
well-founded
Highlights the basis of its reliability, although it doesn't explicitly specify scientific basis.
soundly reasoned
Highlights the logical and rational basis for something, rather than experimental results.
logically sound
Emphasizes the rational coherence rather than empirical validation.
FAQs
How do I use "scientifically sound" in a sentence?
Use "scientifically sound" to describe research, methods, or conclusions that are based on solid scientific evidence and principles. For example, "The study used a "scientifically sound" methodology to gather data".
What does it mean for something to be "scientifically sound"?
For something to be "scientifically sound" means that it is based on reliable scientific methods, data, and theories. It suggests that the findings or conclusions are well-supported by evidence and have undergone rigorous testing and peer review.
What are some synonyms for "scientifically sound"?
Synonyms for "scientifically sound" include "evidence-based", "research-backed", and "empirically supported". These alternatives emphasize the reliability and validity of information.
Is it appropriate to use "scientifically sound" in everyday conversation?
While "scientifically sound" is generally used in more formal or technical contexts, it can be used in everyday conversation when discussing topics related to science, health, or technology. However, simpler terms like "reliable" or "well-researched" might be more suitable for casual conversations.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested