evidence-based

USAGE SUMMARY

"evidence-based" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe decisions, solutions, practices, etc. that are based on evidence or data. For example, "The school adopted an evidence-based approach to evaluating potential candidates for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

48 human-written examples

I am all for "evidence-based medicine".

The New York Times

And politics is not necessarily evidence-based".

The New York Times - Science

This is evidence-based dating.

The Guardian

Morgan does not hesitate: "Evidence-based medicine.

The Guardian

Current guidelines are not evidence-based.

The Guardian

You've heard of evidence-based medicine?

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

12 human-written examples

She likes evidence based policy".

The Guardian

We're all operating on evidence based models".

The Guardian

For services to evidence based medical care.

The Guardian

Evidence Based Instructional Practices.

International Journal of STEM Education

Evidence Based Homeopath.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about "evidence-based" practices, specify the type of evidence used (e.g., randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses) to enhance credibility and transparency.

Common error

Avoid using "evidence-based" to describe something if the supporting evidence is weak, preliminary, or based on a small sample size. Instead, use qualifiers like "preliminary evidence suggests" or "based on limited evidence".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "evidence-based" primarily functions as an adjective used to describe a noun, indicating that the noun (e.g., practice, policy, decision) is based on or supported by evidence. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Science

37%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "evidence-based" is a common and grammatically correct adjective used to describe practices, policies, or decisions founded on empirical evidence. Ludwig AI validates this assessment. It appears frequently in news, scientific, and business contexts, lending credibility to discussions of research, policy, and best practices. Related terms include "data-driven" and "research-backed". When employing "evidence-based", it's best to specify the evidence type and avoid overstating its strength, to maintain precision and transparency in communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

data-driven

Focuses specifically on data as the source of evidence.

research-backed

Highlights the role of research studies in supporting a claim.

empirically supported

Emphasizes the empirical or observational nature of the evidence.

fact-based

Stresses the reliance on verifiable facts.

scientifically sound

Implies a rigorous scientific methodology.

validated

Suggests the evidence has been confirmed through testing.

informed by evidence

Indicates evidence plays a role in decisions, but not necessarily the sole determinant.

experimentally confirmed

Highlights experimental verification of evidence.

evidence-informed

Similar to "informed by evidence", implying a more nuanced approach to evidence.

grounded in evidence

Emphasizes a firm basis of support.

FAQs

How can I use "evidence-based" in a sentence?

You can use "evidence-based" to describe decisions, solutions, practices, etc, that are based on evidence or data. For example, "The school adopted an "evidence-based" approach to evaluating potential candidates for the position".

What's the difference between "evidence-based" and "data-driven"?

"Evidence-based" is a broader term encompassing various forms of evidence, including qualitative research and expert opinions, while "data-driven" specifically emphasizes decisions based on quantitative data.

What are some alternatives to "evidence-based"?

Depending on the context, you can use "research-backed", "empirically supported", or "fact-based" as alternatives to "evidence-based".

Is it always necessary to use "evidence-based" when describing a practice?

While highlighting the evidence base of a practice can add credibility, it's not always necessary. In some cases, the evidence may be implicit or widely understood, and using the term could be redundant. However, in contested fields the additional clarity brought by the use of the term might be worthwhile.