Ai Feedback
"scientific quality" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is usually used to refer to the rigorousness or precision with which something has been studied or analyzed scientifically. For example, "The research team was praised for its high scientific quality."
Exact(59)
Scientific quality reported: Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented?
Peer review is not the absolute or final arbiter of scientific quality.
Though an important component of scientific quality control, peer review is hardly free from error.
But I didn't feel confident in judging the scientific quality of a study like this.
These present alternative pictures of scientific quality by resisting the temptation to add everything up to a single figure.
And The Metric Tide report in the UK also pointed to goal displacement when using bibliometric indicators for scientific quality.
"Study proposals are reviewed for scientific quality and the likelihood that they will yield data on meaningful benefits".
There is a need for new indicators of scientific quality, but we also suggest the need to rethink how research agendas are formulated.
The scientists' findings suggest that there are "deficits in the scientific quality of regulatory documents and a general absence of accurate experimental descriptions available before releases start".
It is an index of every paper published in life science journals and eBooks, and with 22 million citations listed, the scientific quality varies.
Therefore, publication in non-mainstream journals cannot be attributed only to 'low scientific quality' research.
Related(20)
forensic quality
scientific adequacy
technological quality
cultural quality
professional quality
academic quality
research quality
knowledge quality
scholarly quality
scientific competition
scientific poll
scientific battle
scientific stalwart
scientific explanation
scientific background
scientific movement
scientific fact
scientific proof
scientific sense
scientific nonsense
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com