"scholarly quality" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe something that displays the characteristics of scholarly work, such as being well-researched, thorough, and objective. Example: The research paper was praised for its scholarly quality, as it included extensive references, a clear thesis, and well-supported arguments.
An e-mail, seen by The Economist, tells her that though the book's scholarly quality is not in question, the potential legal costs and difficulties involved in being required to prove that its premise is true, or even in getting a detailed opinion of the risks, are too great.
Fortunately there are a number of ways to give researchers access to authoritative scholarly quality information at much reduced, or even no cost.
Most interviewees mentioned that OA megajournals could be a good outlet for negative results, which may meet tests of scholarly quality but not of significance in more traditional publication outlets.
He leans against a classical column, an allusion to his scholarly qualities.
But even then, your professional reputation would best be served were you to consider only the scholarly qualities of each essay, not the weaselly behavior of its writer.
The mandate in choosing the winner was "to select the one that shows the most outstanding scholarly qualities in terms of original research, clarity and readability," said Donald P. McDonagh, president of the Dance Perspectives Foundation.
As I was writing, Elida seemed to thwart my narrator at every turn, yet she exuded a scholarly ascetic quality that was irresistible to him.
For example the 'scholarship' group includes criticisms which together may facilitate a discussion about scholarly writing quality in the context of Alexander's second theory.
Advocates of more open reviewing, like Mr. Cohen at George Mason argue that other important scholarly values besides quality control — for example, generating discussion, improving works in progress and sharing information rapidly — are given short shrift under the current system.
The authors also noted that accessibility-related indicators were usually left out of scholarly conceptions of quality.
We argue that the disclosure of more, valuable R&D work in quality scholarly publications and collaborations with academic partners positively affect firm innovation.
