scientific competition

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "scientific competition" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to contests or challenges within the scientific community, such as competitions for research grants, awards, or innovation challenges. Example: "The annual scientific competition encourages researchers to present their groundbreaking work and compete for funding."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Science & Research

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

24 human-written examples

Scientific competition is fierce.

The New York Times

That is the essence of scientific competition.

The New York Times

How important is the Intel competition -- or any other scientific competition?

The New York Times

Secrecy is strongly predicted by scientific competition (measured as concern over having one's research results anticipated).

Nature

Tellingly, the current fascination with STEM toys comes at a moment of renewed American awareness of international scientific competition.

The New Yorker

Instead, it may be better to focus on alleviating some of the negative consequences of scientific competition.

Nature

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

36 human-written examples

Scientific competitions are becoming more common in many research areas of artificial intelligence and robotics, since they provide a shared testbed for comparing different solutions and enable the exchange of research results.

Artificial Intelligence

FOR years, prestigious scientific competitions like the Intel Science Talent Search (more familiar by its former name, the Westinghouse program) were dominated by high school students from such science powerhouses as Stuyvesant, Bronx Science, Brooklyn Tech and some Long Island schools.

The New York Times

The competition and scientific rivalry resulting from his discoveries further encouraged researchers to seek new methods of measuring time more accurately.

Wikipedia

Nature enthusiasts of all ages are invited to the 2017 SIPS BioBlitz an action-packed scientific endeavor, competition, festival and educational programming Sept. 8-9 at Cayuga Nature Center.

Cornell University

In most professions, and even, for that matter, in the scientific community, competition insures that, over time, good ideas are diffused through the whole system: people who don't absorb and adapt fail.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about "scientific competition", consider specifying the area or field of science to provide context and clarity. For example, "scientific competition in genetics research" or "international scientific competition in space exploration".

Common error

Avoid focusing solely on the negative consequences of "scientific competition", such as secrecy or unethical practices. While these exist, also acknowledge the positive outcomes like innovation and faster scientific progress.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "scientific competition" functions as a noun phrase, often acting as the subject or object of a sentence. It identifies a scenario characterized by rivalry and striving for achievement within the scientific community. Ludwig examples show its use in discussing both positive and negative aspects of this phenomenon.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

50%

Science & Research

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "scientific competition" effectively describes the competitive environment within the scientific community. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usage across various contexts, predominantly in News & Media and Science. The term can refer to competition for funding, recognition, or discoveries, and it's important to acknowledge both the positive and negative aspects. Related terms include "scientific rivalry" and "research competition". When discussing "scientific competition", it is helpful to specify the particular scientific field to provide more precise context. Recognizing the potential downsides, such as increased secrecy and unethical practices, alongside the benefits of innovation and progress, ensures a balanced perspective.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

research competition

Directly relates to the competitive nature of securing funding and recognition in research.

scientific rivalry

Highlights the antagonism and competition specifically between scientists.

research rivalry

Focuses specifically on the competitive aspect within research fields.

academic contest

Emphasizes the competitive nature within academia.

technological competition

Shifts the focus to competition in the technological domain, which often overlaps with scientific advancements.

innovation race

Implies a competitive pursuit of innovation, often with implications for scientific progress.

race for scientific discovery

Focuses on the competitive urgency to make new scientific discoveries.

quest for scientific advancement

Describes the competitive effort toward furthering scientific knowledge.

battle for scientific funding

Emphasizes competition for the financial resources required for scientific research.

struggle for scientific dominance

Highlights the fight for leadership in scientific fields.

FAQs

How can "scientific competition" foster innovation?

By pushing researchers and institutions to strive for excellence and novelty, "scientific competition" encourages the development of new ideas, technologies, and approaches. This drive can lead to breakthroughs that might not occur in a less competitive environment.

What are some potential downsides of "scientific competition"?

Excessive "scientific competition" can lead to negative consequences such as increased secrecy, reduced collaboration, and even unethical behavior as researchers feel pressured to publish results quickly. Additionally, it can create a stressful environment that hinders creativity.

What's the difference between "scientific competition" and "scientific rivalry"?

"Scientific competition" describes the general competitive landscape in science, whereas "scientific rivalry" often refers to personal or group rivalries between specific scientists or research teams. "Scientific rivalry" is typically more focused and intense.

In what contexts is "scientific competition" most prevalent?

"Scientific competition" is most prevalent in fields with high levels of funding and public interest, such as biomedical research, artificial intelligence, and climate science. These areas often attract many researchers vying for limited resources and recognition.